Quest for postdialysis urea rebound-equilibrated Kt/V with only intradialytic urea samples.

BACKGROUND Postdialysis urea rebound (PDUR) is a cause of Kt/V overestimation when it is calculated from predialysis and the immediate postdialysis blood urea collections. Measuring PDUR requires a 30- or 60-minute postdialysis sampling, which is inconvenient. Several methods had been devised for a reasonable approach to determine PDUR-equilibrated Kt/V in short dialysis without the need for a delayed sample. The aim of our study was to compare these different Kt/V methods during the longer eight-hour hemodialysis sessions, and to determine the optimum intradialytic urea sample time that fits best with PDUR. METHODS The study included 21 patients (mean age 71.9 years) who were hemodialyzed for 60+/-60 months at three times eight hours weekly, using bicarbonate dialysate and cellulosic membranes. Blood urea samples were obtained at onset, and then at 17, 33, 50, 66, 75, 80, 85, and 100% of the dialysis session times, after 30 seconds of low flow, and then at 60-minutes postdialysis. All patients had a meal during dialysis. We compared four different formulas of Kt/V [(a) Kt/V-Smye with a 33% dialysis time urea sample, (b) two-pool equilibrated eKt/V, (c) Kt/V-std (Daugirdas-2) obtained with an immediate postdialytic sample, and (d) the different intradialytic urea samples for Kt/V (50, 66, 75, 80, and 85% of dialysis time)] with the equilibrated 60-minute PDUR Kt/V (Kt/V-r-60) formula as the reference method. RESULTS The mean PDUR was 17.2+/-9%, leading to an overestimation of Kt/V-std by 12.2%. Kt/V-r-60 was 1.68+/-0.34. Kt/V-std was 1.88+/-0.36 (Delta = 12.2+/-4.8%, r = 0.8). eKt/V was 1.77+/-0.3 (Delta = 5+/-5%, r = 0.96), and Kt/V-Smye was 1.79+/-0.47 (Delta = 5.2+/-14%, r = 0.9). The best time for the intradialytic sampling was 80% (that is, at 6 hr and 24 min). The Kt/V-80 was 1.64+/-0.3 and was best fitted with Kt/V-r-60 (Delta = -1.8+/-8%, r = 0.91). The mean intradialytic urea evolution showed a three-exponential rate, in discrepancy with the two-exponential rate theoretical model. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm that a significant postdialysis rebound exists in an eight-hour dialysis. An intradialytic urea sample taken at 80% of the total session time permits an estimation of the 60-minute Kt/V-rebound without the necessity of taking a delayed sample, with better accuracy than eKt/V or especially Kt/V-Smye. This may be related to a particular urea kinetics curve on the longer dialysis duration, which needs to be studied further.

[1]  Moncrief Jw,et al.  The consequences of physiological resistances on metabolite removal from the patient-artifical kidney system. , 1975 .

[2]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Screening for extreme postdialysis urea rebound using the Smye method: patients with access recirculation identified when a slow flow method is not used to draw the postdialysis blood. , 1996, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[3]  P. Watson,et al.  Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. , 1980, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  A regional blood circulation alternative to in-series two compartment urea kinetic modeling. , 1993, ASAIO journal.

[5]  J. Daugirdas Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  S Bhaskaran,et al.  Blood Urea Levels 30 Minutes Before the End of Dialysis Are Equivalent to Equilibrated Blood Urea , 1997, ASAIO journal.

[8]  J. García-Valdecasas,et al.  Validation of different methods to calculate Kt/V considering postdialysis rebound. , 1997, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[9]  T. Haas,et al.  Plasma kinetics of small molecules during and after hemofiltration: decrease in hemofiltration efficiency related to increase in ultrafiltration rate. , 1983, Clinical nephrology.

[10]  B Canaud,et al.  A simple and accurate method to determine equilibrated post-dialysis urea concentration. , 1997, Kidney international.

[11]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[12]  T. Depner,et al.  Assessing adequacy of hemodialysis: urea modeling. , 1994, Kidney international.

[13]  R Charbonneau,et al.  Postdialysis urea rebound: determinants and influence on dialysis delivery in chronic hemodialysis patients. , 1996, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  K. Farrington,et al.  The post-hemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. , 1996, Kidney international.

[15]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. , 1995, ASAIO journal.

[16]  B. Charra,et al.  Is Post-Dialysis Urea Rebound Significant with Long Slow Hemodialysis? , 1998, Blood Purification.

[17]  J. Guh,et al.  Prediction of equilibrated postdialysis BUN by an artificial neural network in high-efficiency hemodialysis. , 1998, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[18]  S W Smye,et al.  Estimation of treatment dose in high-efficiency haemodialysis. , 1994, Nephron.

[19]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. , 1997, Kidney international.

[20]  Urea rebound and residual renal function in the calculation of Kt/V and protein catabolic rate. , 1993, Kidney international. Supplement.