Duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in different acoustic environments.

This work deals with the duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in rooms with very different reverberation times (RTs). Measurements were conducted using the Ambulatory Phonation Monitoring (APM) 3200 (Kaypentax, Montvale, NJ) and Voice-Care devices (developed at the Politecnico di Torino, Italy), both of which have a contact microphone placed on the base of the neck to detect skin vibrations during phonation. Six university professors and 22 university students made short laboratory monologs in which they explained something that they knew well to a listener 6 m away. Seven students also described a map with the intention of correctly explaining directions to a listener who drew the path on a blank chart. Longer speech samples were made by 25 primary school teachers in classrooms. A tendency to increase the voicing periods as the RT increased was on average observed for the university professors, the school teachers, and the university students who described a map. These students also showed longer silence periods than the students who made short monologs. The recognized trends concerned voice professionals or subjects who were highly motivated to make themselves understood in a perturbed speaking situation. Nonparametric statistical tests, which were applied to detect the differences in distributions of voicing and silence periods, have basically supported the findings.

[1]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Design Issues for a Portable Vocal Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Voicing and silence periods in daily and weekly vocalizations of teachers. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. H. Bernacki,et al.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  T H Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected speech signals: preliminary results. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  K. Stevens,et al.  Emotions and speech: some acoustical correlates. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Brigitte Zellner,et al.  Pauses and the temporal structure of speech , 1995 .

[10]  Simon King,et al.  The listening talker: A review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech , 2014, Comput. Speech Lang..

[11]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Quantifying Vocal Fatigue Recovery: Dynamic Vocal Recovery Trajectories after a Vocal Loading Exercise , 2009, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[13]  Cheol-Ho Jeong,et al.  Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. M. Dauer Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. , 1983 .

[15]  John W. Black The Effect of Room Characteristics upon Vocal Intensity and Rate , 1949 .

[16]  J. Švec,et al.  Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Influence of classroom acoustics on the vocal behavior of teachers , 2013 .

[18]  R. Bergmann,et al.  Different Outcomes of the Wilcoxon—Mann—Whitney Test from Different Statistics Packages , 2000 .

[19]  J C Junqua,et al.  The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Adaptation of a Pocket PC for use as a wearable voice dosimeter. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  V. Hazan,et al.  Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Hcrc Map Task Corpus , 1991 .

[24]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A pattern recognition approach to voiced-unvoiced-silence classification with applications to speech recognition , 1976 .

[25]  J. C. Krause,et al.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Technical considerations in the design of a wearable voice dosimeter , 2002 .

[28]  Wolfgang Hess,et al.  Pitch Determination of Speech Signals , 1983 .

[29]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Ambulatory Monitoring of Disordered Voices , 2006, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.