Apparent electrical conductivity of soil (ECa) is a property frequently used as a diagnostic tool in precision agriculture, and is measured using vehicle-mounted proximal sensors. Crop-yield data, which is measured by harvester-mounted sensors, is usually collected at a higher spatial density compared to ECa. ECa and crop-yield maps frequently exhibit similar spatial patterns because ECa is primarily controlled by the soil clay content and the interrelated soil moisture content, which are often significant contributors to crop-yield potential. By quantifying the spatial relationship between soil ECa and crop yield, it is possible to estimate the value of ECa at the spatial resolution of the crop-yield data. This is achieved through the use of a local regression kriging approach which uses the higher-resolution crop-yield data as a covariate to predict ECa at a higher spatial resolution than would be prudent with the original ECa data alone. The accuracy of the local regression kriging (LRK) method is evaluated against local kriging (LK) and local regression (LR) to predict ECa. The results indicate that the performance of LRK is dependent on the performance of the inherent local regression. Over a range of ECa transect survey densities, LRK provides greater accuracy than LK and LR, except at very low density. Maps of the regression coefficients demonstrated that the relationship between ECa and crop yield varies from year to year, and across a field. The application of LRK to commercial scale ECa survey data, using crop yield as a covariate, should improve the accuracy of the resultant maps. This has implications for employing the maps in crop-management decisions and building more robust calibrations between field-gathered soil ECa and primary soil properties such as clay content.
[1]
Edzer J. Pebesma.
The Role of External Variables and GIS Databases in Geostatistical Analysis
,
2006,
Trans. GIS.
[2]
Bg Williams,et al.
The use of electromagnetic induction to detect the spatial variability of the salt and clay contents of soils
,
1987
.
[3]
Olivier Banton,et al.
Mapping Field-Scale Physical Properties of Soil with Electrical Resistivity
,
1997
.
[4]
James E. Ayars,et al.
Identifying Soil Properties that Influence Cotton Yield Using Soil Sampling Directed by Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity
,
2003
.
[5]
David A. Mortensen,et al.
Site-Specific Management Zones Based on Soil Electrical Conductivity in a Semiarid Cropping System
,
2003
.
[6]
Scott M. Lesch,et al.
Spatial Prediction of Soil Salinity Using Electromagnetic Induction Techniques: 1. Statistical Prediction Models: A Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Cokriging
,
1995
.
[7]
Budiman Minasny,et al.
Spatial prediction of topsoil salinity in the Chelif Valley, Algeria, using local ordinary kriging with local variograms versus whole-area variogram
,
2001
.
[8]
A. R. Anuar,et al.
Relationship between Rice Yield and Apparent Electrical Conductivity of Paddy Soils
,
2010
.