Cell-Phone Related Injuries in the United States from 2000‒2012

Background: The incidence of injuries sustained by cell phone users other than drivers and pedestrians is not well characterized. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance (NEISS) database was searched to identify injuries involving cell phone use in all settings. The study period was January 2000 to December 2012. Results: We identified 515 records of ED visits related to cell phone use. 48% of injuries occurred in the home setting. Sixty-two percent of the patients were female; 55% were younger than 40. National estimates, derived from weighted case incidence, revealed statistically significant increases in the number of annual cases, particularly for injuries sustained while texting. Most injuries were minor, but 11% of patients required hospitalization. Discussion: The estimated national number of injuries associated with cell phone use is increasing annually in all scenarios studied, particularly among pedestrians and while texting. Conclusion: Distraction is inherent during cell phone use. The injury risk posed by cell phone use must be an integral component of prevention strategies and product design.

[1]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Drivers , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  Driving performance while using cell phones: an observational study. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[3]  Despina Stavrinos,et al.  Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  S. Blumberg,et al.  Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010-2011. , 2012, National health statistics reports.

[5]  Kristen E Beede,et al.  Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  T. Dingus,et al.  Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Richard Lichenstein,et al.  Headphone use and pedestrian injury and death in the United States: 2004–2011 , 2012, Injury Prevention.

[8]  Frank Drews,et al.  Text Messaging During Simulated Driving , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Katherine W. Byington,et al.  Effect of Cell Phone Distraction on Pediatric Pedestrian Injury Risk , 2009, Pediatrics.

[10]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[11]  T. Bungum,et al.  The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk , 2005, Journal of Community Health.

[12]  Richard Wener,et al.  Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Richard Lichenstein,et al.  Ambulatory cell phone injuries in the United States: an emerging national concern. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Karin A Mack,et al.  Gender differences in seeking care for falls in the aged Medicare population. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[16]  Kimberly A. Patton Teens and Technology , 2011 .

[17]  Gregory Dolin Man Fined in Baltimore County Crash that Killed 5-year-old Boy , 2013 .