Tuning of activation thresholds explains flexibility in the selection and development of T cells in the thymus.

Immature CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes expressing T-cell antigen receptors (TCR) are selected by TCR-mediated recognition of peptides associated with major histocompatibility complex molecules on thymic stromal cells. Selection ensures reactivity of the mature cells to foreign antigens and tolerance to self. Although much has been learned about the factors that determine whether a thymocyte with a given specificity will be positively or negatively selected, selection as an aspect of the developmental process as a whole is less well-understood. Here we invoke a model in which thymocytes tune their response characteristics individually and dynamically in the course of development. Cellular development and selection are driven by receptor-mediated metabolic perturbations. Perturbation is a measure of the net intracellular change induced by external stimulation. It results from the integration of several signals and countersignals over time and therefore depends on the environment and the maturation stage of the cell. Individual cell adaptation limits the range of perturbations. Such adaptation renders thymocytes less sensitive to the level of stimulation per se, but responsive to environmental changes in that level. This formulation begins to explain the mechanisms that link developmental and selection events to each other.

[1]  Z. Grossman,et al.  From HIV infection to AIDS: are the manifestations of effective immune resistance misinterpreted? , 1993, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[2]  R. Germain,et al.  Peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II complexes with mixed agonist/antagonist properties provide evidence for ligand-related differences in T cell receptor-dependent intracellular signaling , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Cellular Tolerance as a Dynamic State of the Adaptable Lymphocyte , 1993, Immunological reviews.

[4]  G. Schönrich,et al.  Multiple levels of peripheral tolerance. , 1993, Immunology today.

[5]  K. Migita,et al.  The fate of anergic T cells in vivo. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[6]  A. Singer,et al.  Crosstalk in the mouse thymus. , 1994, Immunology today.

[7]  Z. Grossman Recognition of self, balance of growth and competition: Horizontal networks regulate immune responsiveness , 1982, European journal of immunology.

[8]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Discrepancy between in vitro measurable and in vivo virus neutralizing cytotoxic T cell reactivities. Low T cell receptor specificity and avidity sufficient for in vitro proliferation or cytotoxicity to peptide-coated target cells but not for in vivo protection. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[9]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Adaptive cellular interactions in the immune system: the tunable activation threshold and the significance of subthreshold responses. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P. Ohashi,et al.  Immunological function of a defined T-cell population tolerized to low-affinity self antigens , 1995, Nature.

[11]  C. Goodnow Balancing immunity and tolerance: deleting and tuning lymphocyte repertoires. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  G. Linette,et al.  Bcl-2 is upregulated at the CD4+ CD8+ stage during positive selection and promotes thymocyte differentiation at several control points. , 1994, Immunity.

[13]  M. Tyers,et al.  A new family of regulators of G-protein-coupled receptors? , 1996, Current Biology.

[14]  P. Allen,et al.  Separation of IL-4 production from Th cell proliferation by an altered T cell receptor ligand. , 1991, Science.

[15]  P. Allen,et al.  Induction of T-cell anergy by altered T-cell-receptor ligand on live antigen-presenting cells , 1993, Nature.

[16]  K. Katz,et al.  Positive selection of CD4+ T cells by TCR ligation without aggregation even in the absence of MHC , 1994, Nature.

[17]  M. Jenkins,et al.  Memory and anergy: challenges to traditional models of T lymphocyte differentiation , 1992, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[18]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Recognition of Self and Regulation of Specificity at the Level of Cell Populations , 1984, Immunological reviews.

[19]  J. Mayer,et al.  Mature T cell reactivity altered by peptide agonist that induces positive selection , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[20]  H. Grey,et al.  Negative selection of CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes by T-cell receptor peptide antagonists. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Bevan,et al.  Positive selection of thymocytes. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[22]  C. June,et al.  Inhibition of T cell receptor expression and function in immature CD4+CD8+ cells by CD4. , 1990, Science.