The Evidence Hub: Harnessing the Collective Intelligence of Communities to Build Evidence-Based Knowledge

Conventional document and discussion websites provide users with no help in assessing the quality or quantity of evidence behind any given idea. Besides, the very meaning of what evidence is may not be unequivocally defined within a community, and may require deep understanding, common ground and debate. An Evidence Hub is a tool to pool the community collective intelligence on what is evidence for an idea. It provides an infrastructure for debating and building evidence-based knowledge and practice. An Evidence Hub is best thought of as a filter onto other websites — a map that distills the most important issues, ideas and evidence from the noise by making clear why ideas and web resources may be worth further investigation. This paper describes the Evidence Hub concept and rationale, the breath of user engagement and the evolution of specific features, derived from our work with different community groups in the healthcare and educational sector.

[1]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Cohere: A Prototype for Contested Collective Intelligence , 2010 .

[2]  Pierre Lévy,et al.  Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace , 1997 .

[3]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation , 2008, COMMA.

[4]  Shelly Farnham,et al.  Structured online interactions: improving the decision-making of small discussion groups , 2000, CSCW '00.

[5]  Jin-Tan Yang,et al.  Visualizing Argumentation -Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Chris Reed,et al.  Argumentation Schemes , 2008 .

[7]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[8]  Gregorio Convertino,et al.  Soccer Science and the Bayes Community: Exploring the Cognitive Implications of Modern Scientific Communication , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Mark Klein,et al.  Collective intelligence as community discourse and action , 2012, CSCW.

[10]  Floris Bex,et al.  Computational Models of Argument, Proceedings of COMMA , 2008, COMMA 2008.

[11]  Richards J. Heuer,et al.  Psychology of Intelligence Analysis , 1999 .

[12]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  The cost structure of sensemaking , 1993, INTERCHI.

[13]  Clay Shirky.  The Political Power of Social Media , 2010 .

[14]  Aaron Weiss.  The power of collective intelligence , 2005, NTWK.

[15]  Antonietta Grasso,et al.  Collective Intelligence in Organizations: Tools and Studies , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[16]  Gregorio Convertino,et al.  The CACHE Study: Group Effects in Computer-supported Collaborative Analysis , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[17]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence , 2009 .

[18]  Tero Ojanpera,et al.  The power of collective intelligence , 2011, 2011 IEEE Technology Time Machine Symposium on Technologies Beyond 2020.

[19]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argumentation Theory: A Very Short Introduction , 2009, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence.

[20]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Contested Collective Intelligence: Rationale, Technologies, and a Human-Machine Annotation Study , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).