Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring

Judgmental anchoring constitutes an ubiquitous and robust phenomenon. Nevertheless, its underlying mechanisms remain somewhat mysterious. We discuss four accounts that attempt to explain anchoring effects: insufficient adjustment, conversational inferences and numeric priming seem to be insufficient to understand the phenomenon. As an alternative, we propose a Selective Accessibility model. Drawing on the notions of hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming, the model assumes that anchoring effects are mediated by the selectively increased accessibility of anchor-consistent knowledge. Tests of the model's basic assumptions are reported and its implications are discussed.

[1]  B. Carlson.  Anchoring and adjustment in judgments under risk. , 1990 .

[2]  David Faust,et al.  Eliminating the hindsight bias. , 1988 .

[3]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. , 1993 .

[4]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[5]  George A. Quattrone.  Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. , 1982 .

[6]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[7]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood. , 1977 .

[8]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[9]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive processes in preference reversals , 1989 .

[10]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  What Makes You So Sure? Effects of Epistemic Motivations on judgmental Confidence , 1987 .

[11]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. , 1999 .

[12]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  The Law of Cognitive Structure Activation , 1991 .

[13]  T. Ostrom,et al.  9 – Psychological Perspective and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[14]  F. Strack,et al.  Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast , 1993 .

[15]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction , 1988 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[18]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The limits of anchoring. , 1994 .

[19]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Category accessibility as implicit memory , 1988 .

[21]  Derek J. Koehler,et al.  Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[24]  F. Strack,et al.  Effects of salience and time pressure on ratings of social causality , 1982 .

[25]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Bias in utility assessments: further evidence and explanations , 1989 .

[26]  F. Strack,et al.  Subjective Theories About Encoding May Influence Recognition: Judgmental Regulation in Human Memory , 1998 .

[27]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[28]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  You can't not believe everything you read. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior. , 1991 .

[30]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Confirmatory Search, and the Construction of Values. , 1999 .

[31]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[32]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[33]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Implicit Stereotyping in Person Judgment. , 1993 .

[35]  F. Strack.  The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies , 1992 .

[36]  Brian H. Bornstein,et al.  The More You Ask For, the More You Get: Anchoring in Personal Injury Verdicts , 1996 .

[37]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[38]  V. A. Harris,et al.  The Attribution of Attitudes , 1967 .

[39]  P. Herr,et al.  Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. , 1986 .

[40]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility , 2000 .

[41]  A. Parducci.  Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[42]  Abhijit Biswas,et al.  Consumer perceptions of tensile price claims in advertisements: An assessment of claim types across different discount levels , 1993 .

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[44]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Comparison Processes in Hindsight and Causal Attribution , 1995 .

[45]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[46]  F. Strack,et al.  Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. , 1985, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[47]  L. L. Martin,et al.  Set/reset: use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  The role of applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias , 1996 .

[49]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Procedurally mediated social inferences: The case of category accessibility effects , 1987 .

[50]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[51]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesis , 1991 .

[52]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[53]  I. Ritov,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Anchoring in Simulated Competitive Market Negotiation , 2022 .

[54]  Edward J. Joyce,et al.  Anchoring and Adjustment In Probabilistic Inference in Auditing , 1981 .

[55]  S. Plous,et al.  Thinking the Unthinkable : The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear Warl , 1989 .

[56]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Spousal Predictions , 1986 .

[57]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[59]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[60]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Stimulus-similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[61]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[62]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[63]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Cognitive Biases in Playing the Lottery: Estimating the Odds and Choosing the Numbers , 1992 .

[65]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  An Examination of the Effects of Information Consistency and Distinctiveness in a Reference-Price Advertisement Context , 1993 .

[67]  Martin F. Davies,et al.  Field dependence and hindsight bias: Cognitive restructuring and the generation of reasons , 1992 .

[68]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  R. Wyer,et al.  Effects of rank ordering stimuli on magnitude ratings of these and other stimuli , 1985 .

[70]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[71]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Cognitive strategies in a complex judgment task: Analyses of concurrent verbal reports and judgments of cumulated risk over different exposure times , 1985 .

[72]  E. Higgins,et al.  Accessibility and Applicability: Some "Activation Rules" Influencing Judgment , 1995 .

[73]  Martin F. Davies,et al.  Belief Persistence after Evidential Discrediting: The Impact of Generated versus Provided Explanations on the Likelihood of Discredited Outcomes , 1997 .

[74]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[75]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[76]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[77]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Context, categorization, and recall: The “change-of-standard” effect , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[78]  C. Stangor,et al.  A "change-of-standard" perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context , 1989 .

[80]  William F. Wright,et al.  Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment , 1989 .

[81]  F. Strack.  Zur Psychologie der standardisierten Befragung , 1994 .

[82]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[83]  G. Wells,et al.  Outcome trees and baseball: A study of expertise and list-length effects , 1991 .

[84]  M. Yadav.  How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment , 1994 .

[85]  F. Strack,et al.  Thinking, Judging, and Communicating: A Process Account of Context Effects in Attitude Surveys , 1987 .

[86]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[87]  Y. Trope,et al.  Confirmatory and diagnosing strategies in social information gathering. , 1982 .