Curveball: A tool for rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity based on smooth eye movements

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) is an informative measure of visual function, but current tools for assessing it are limited by the attentional, motor, and communicative abilities of the participant. Impairments in these abilities can prevent participants from engaging with tasks or following an experimenter's instructions. Here, we describe an efficient new tool for measuring contrast sensitivity, Curveball, and empirically validate it with a sample of healthy adults. The Curveball algorithm continuously infers stimulus visibility through smooth eye tracking instead of perceptual report, and rapidly lowers stimulus contrast in real time until a threshold is found. The procedure requires minimal instruction to administer and takes only five minutes to estimate a full CSF, which is comparable to the best existing methods available for healthy adults. Task repeatability was high: the coefficients of repeatability were 0.275 (in log10 units of RMS contrast) within the same session and 0.227 across different days. We also present evidence that the task is robust across illumination changes, well correlated with results from conventional psychophysical methods, and highly sensitive to improvements in visual acuity from refractive correction. Our findings indicate that Curveball is a promising means of accurately assessing contrast sensitivity in previously neglected populations.

[1]  S. Kéri,et al.  Abnormal neurological signs, visual contrast sensitivity, and the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia , 2006, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  G. Woo.  Contrast sensitivity function as a diagnostic tool in low vision. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[3]  Alexander C. Schütz,et al.  Eye movements and perception: a selective review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Michael Dorr,et al.  Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Agostino Gibaldi,et al.  Evaluation of the Tobii EyeX Eye tracking controller and Matlab toolkit for research , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[7]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: The quick TvC method , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  Tatsuo Hirose,et al.  Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity function using contrast sweep visual evoked responses , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  R C Kleiner,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[11]  Velma Dobson,et al.  Visual acuity in human infants: A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studies , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  D Regan,et al.  Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and the discrimination of Snellen letters in multiple sclerosis. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  B. Cohen,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the velocity characteristics of optokinetic nystagmus and optokinetic after‐nystagmus , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  E. Vul,et al.  Functional adaptive sequential testing. , 2010, Seeing and perceiving.

[15]  M. Edwards,et al.  Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis: One‐year follow‐up , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  G. Legge,et al.  Predicting the contrast sensitivity of low vision observers , 1986, Annual Meeting Optical Society of America.

[17]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Smooth pursuit eye movements in response to predictable target motions , 1983, Vision Research.

[18]  Matthew Anderson,et al.  Proposal for a Standard Default Color Space for the Internet - sRGB , 1996, CIC.

[19]  R M Douglas,et al.  Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Evaluation of the precision of contrast sensitivity function assessment on a tablet device , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  M. Onofrj,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in Parkinson's disease: spatial frequency, temporal rate, contrast, and the effect of dopaminergic drugs , 1986 .

[22]  G. Henning,et al.  Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations , 2017, PeerJ.

[23]  L. Hainline,et al.  Comparison of Measures of Visual Acuity in Infants: Teller Acuity Cards and Sweep Visual Evoked Potentials , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Walker-Smith.  Development of visual acuity , 2006 .

[26]  Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients , 1997, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  Ivan Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Cerebral Lesions , 1972, Science.

[28]  L G Carney,et al.  Visual performance in high myopia. , 1990, Current eye research.

[29]  D. Teller,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL ACUITY IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN; THE ACUITY CARD PROCEDURE , 1986, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[30]  N. Hill,et al.  Longitudinal Quantification of Eye-Movement Impairments after Pontine Hemorrhage , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[31]  Rémy Allard,et al.  The noisy-bit method for digital displays: Converting a 256 luminance resolution into a continuous resolution , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[32]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[33]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[34]  G. Barnes,et al.  Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  H R Taylor,et al.  Applying new design principles to the construction of an illiterate E chart. , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[37]  Susan J Leat,et al.  The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision , 1997, Eye.

[38]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  P. Perona,et al.  Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[40]  R. Douglas,et al.  Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  S. Dakin,et al.  Similar contrast sensitivity functions measured using psychophysics and optokinetic nystagmus , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[42]  D. Pelli,et al.  Measuring contrast sensitivity , 2013, Vision Research.

[43]  S. Leat,et al.  Development of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Children , 2009 .

[44]  Johannes Burge,et al.  Continuous psychophysics: Target-tracking to measure visual sensitivity. , 2015, Journal of vision.