Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust

Building trust with users is crucial in a wide range of applications, such as financial transactions, and some minimal degree of trust is required in all applications to even initiate and maintain an interaction with a user. Humans use a variety of relational conversational strategies, including small talk, to establish trusting relationships with each other. We argue that such strategies can also be used by interface agents, and that embodied conversational agents are ideally suited for this task given the myriad cues available to them for signaling trustworthiness. We describe a model of social dialogue, an implementation in an embodied conversation agent, and an experiment in which social dialogue was demonstrated to have an effect on trust, for users with a disposition to be extroverts.

[1]  H. Spencer-Oatey.  Reconsidering power and distance , 1996 .

[2]  Thomas Rist,et al.  The PPP persona: a multipurpose animated presentation agent , 1996, AVI '96.

[3]  James C. Lester,et al.  Cosmo-a life-like animated agent with deictic believability , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  User modeling and user adapted interaction , 2001 .

[5]  Kristinn R. Thórisson.  Gandalf: an embodied humanoid capable of real-time multimodal dialogue with people , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[6]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  J. Svennevig.  Getting acquainted in conversation , 1999 .

[8]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  The predictability of informal conversation , 1990 .

[9]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[10]  Justine Cassell,et al.  External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface , 2000, CACM.

[11]  Paul Resnik,et al.  The Influence of Self-Esteem on Cognitive Responses to Machine-Like versus Human-Like Computer Feedback , 1985 .

[12]  Klaus P. Schneider.  Small talk : analysing phatic discourse , 1988 .

[13]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree Adjoining Grammar , 1997, ACL.

[14]  Charles B. Callaway,et al.  Cosmo: A Life-like Animated Pedagogical Agent with Deictic Believability (cid:3) , 1997 .

[15]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[16]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[17]  E. Goody.  Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction , 1978 .

[18]  Byron Reeves,et al.  The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces , 2000, CHI.

[19]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[20]  Hao Yan,et al.  More than just a pretty face: affordances of embodiment , 2000, IUI '00.

[21]  Ralf D. Brown,et al.  THE PRONOUNS OF POWER AND SOLIDARITY , 1968 .

[22]  H. Reis,et al.  Attraction and close relationships. , 1998 .

[23]  K. Chang,et al.  Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea , 1999, CHI '99.

[24]  M DehnDoris,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents , 2000 .

[25]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[26]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[27]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Human conversation as a system framework: designing embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[28]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction , 2000, CHI.

[30]  E. Goffman.  On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. , 1955, Psychiatry.

[31]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TRUST AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SELF‐DISCLOSURE , 1977 .