Electronically-Mediated Dispute Resolution and E-Commerce

Although the volume of internet commerce continues to increase, some consumers hesitate to conduct business transactions on the internet because of concerns about the trustworthiness of on-line merchants. The presence of readily available, on-line dispute resolution services can send a reassuring signal to consumers that allays their fears and encourages them to do business on-line. However, on-line dispute resolution systems designed to address disputes arising from e-commerce transactions rely on a communication medium that is impoverished, which can lead to lower trust in the process, and to the escalation of negative emotion and negative attributions about the other participants in the dispute resolution process, making successful resolution of the dispute more difficult. A mediator or arbitrator in an on-line setting who is aware of these potential problems can try to avert them by engaging in simple rapport-building procedures. However, facilitating acceptance of on-line dispute resolution decisions may be more difficult than in a traditional face-to-face environment because of the absence of cues that communicate the trustworthiness and neutrality of the third party, as well as acknowledgment of the societal standing of the disputant.

[1]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. , 1993 .

[2]  P. Earley,et al.  Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments , 1990 .

[3]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Schmooze or Lose: Social Friction and Lubrication in E-Mail Negotiations , 2000 .

[4]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application , 2002 .

[5]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[6]  J. Gumperz Discourse strategies: Subject index , 1982 .

[7]  E. Katsh,et al.  E-Commerce, E-Disputes, and E-Dispute Resolution: In the Shadow of "eBay Law" , 2000 .

[8]  E. Landry,et al.  Scrolling Around the New Organization: The Potential for Conflict in the On-Line Environment , 2000 .

[9]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  T. Tyler,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System , 1990 .

[11]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Rapport in Conflict Resolution: Accounting for How Nonverbal Exchange Fosters Coordination on Mutually Beneficial Settlements to Mixed Motive Conflicts. (Раппорт в разрешении конфликта: как невербальный обмен способствует согласованию взаимовыгодных договоренностей в конфликтах со смешанными мотивам , 1998 .

[12]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[13]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. , 1985 .

[14]  M. Morris,et al.  Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. , 2000 .

[15]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice : a field study of mediation and arbitration , 1993 .

[16]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.