Energy Consumption and Emission Rates of Highway Mowing Activities

Mowing the highway right-of-way (ROW) is important for the safety of roadway users and for maintaining highway infrastructure. This paper reports fuel usage and exhaust emission rates from on-board measurements of 12 diesel tractors operated in real-world mowing conditions by the New York State Department of Transportation. The operating conditions and the mower type were the dominant variables determining area-based fuel consumption requirements. Fuel consumption rates were consistent across the different conventional tractor mowing equipment (sickle bar, flail, and rotary mowers), with an average fuel-consumption ± standard deviation of 5.1 ± 2.3 kg-fuel/ha roadside area mowed. Mowing over the guiderails, using a large tractor and a small cutting head, demanded an average fuel-consumption ± standard deviation of 44 ± 15 kg-fuel/ha, which is almost ten times as much fuel per unit area than other conventional mowing activities. Fuel-based emission factors (g-emission/kg-fuel) better reflect the difference across tractor technologies in terms of emission rates of criteria pollutants [e.g., carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), nitrogen oxide (NO), and particulate matter (PM)]. Fuel-based emission factors measured from the in-use tractors compared quite well with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) NONROAD emission factors and confirmed the effectiveness of the U.S. EPA nonroad standards to lower emissions from agricultural tractors. The analysis presents methods for estimating fuel usage and emissions from mowing activities and makes observations about mitigating the environmental impact of mowing activities. Study results can assist in better procurement of appropriate size tractors to yield both fuel savings and emissions benefits.

[1]  K. T. Knapp,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Remote Sensing-Based Hydrocarbon Measurements: A Comparison to FID Measurements. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Field Procedures for Real-World Measurements of Emissions from Diesel Construction Vehicles , 2010 .

[3]  R. Harley,et al.  Scaling of Infrared Remote Sensor Hydrocarbon Measurements for Motor Vehicle Emission Inventory Calculations , 1998 .

[4]  R F Sawyer,et al.  A Fuel-Based Assessment of Off-Road Diesel Engine Emissions , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  Gary R. McVoy,et al.  Promoting Environmental Stewardship in Transportation: Maintenance and Operations at the New York State Department of Transportation , 2002 .

[6]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Remote sensing of NO and NO2 emissions from heavy-duty diesel trucks using tunable diode lasers , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Probabilistic Nonroad Mobile Source Emission Factors , 2003 .

[8]  John B. Liljedahl,et al.  Tractors and Their Power Units , 1952, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[9]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Methods to Reduce Traffic Crashes Involving Deer: What Works and What Does Not , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[10]  Thermo Andersen Environmental Technology Verification Report , 2001 .

[11]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  Characterization of Real-World Activity, Fuel Use, and Emissions for Selected Motor Graders Fueled with Petroleum Diesel and B20 Biodiesel , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  H. Oliver Gao,et al.  Air Quality and Energy Impacts of NYSDOT Highway ROW Management , 2010 .

[13]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Real-World Fuel use and Emissions for Dump Trucks Fueled with B20 Biodiesel versus Petroleum Diesel , 2006 .

[14]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comprehensive Field Study of Fuel Use and Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2010 .

[15]  Haibo Zhai,et al.  Link-Based Emission Factors for Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks Based on Real-World Data , 2008 .