Construction quality directly impacts overall project and built product performance. A means of ensuring effective investment in quality control mechanisms, therefore, can directly benefit the construction industry. Prior to the introduction of emerging inspection technologies such as laser scanners and embedded sensors, the decision of how to best assess and control the quality of construction was simplified by the limited range, amount, and applicability of existing quality control tools. However, as the introduction of advanced sensing technologies improves the number, size, cost, and coverage of available tools, and increases the amount and detail of available quality-related information, the decision-making considerations for quality control investment become less straightforward. The greater coverage and high up-front costs that characterize emerging inspection technologies mean that a large amount of quality-relat ed information can be generated from construction sites, but with an ever-present concern for the benefits resulting from these cost outlays. As new technologies appear, and alter the considerations for decisions about inspection, it is imperative to formalize the reasoning behind quality control resource allocation and set the rules for new entries to the quality control scene. This paper demonstrates the need for improved quality control decision-making, and outlines a framework of site analysis, value analysis, and strategic technology deployment to address this need. Examples of traditional and emerging inspection methods demonstrate essential considerations for the effective implementation of a portfolio of quality control tools, and highlight the need for this analysis framework.
[1]
Dennis A. Swyt.
NIST-ASME WORKSHOP ON UNCERTAINTY IN DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS Gaithersburg, MD June 5–7, 2001
,
2001,
Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[2]
Hoon Sohn,et al.
Field validation of a wireless structural monitoring system on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge
,
2003,
SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.
[3]
Yong Gao,et al.
Instrumental monitoring and nondestructive evaluation of highway bridges
,
1998,
Smart Structures.
[4]
P. Chang,et al.
Survey of Construction Metrology Options for AEC Industry
,
1999
.
[5]
Scott Hamilton,et al.
Intel Research Extends Moore's Law
,
2003,
Computer.
[6]
Robert J. Connor,et al.
LONG-TERM WIRELESS REMOTE MONITORING OF THE LEHIGH RIVER BRIDGE
,
2003
.
[7]
William J. Clancey,et al.
Heuristic Classification
,
1986,
Artif. Intell..
[8]
Maris Juberts,et al.
Towards the Ultimate Construction Site Sensor
,
2002
.
[9]
Sadi Assaf,et al.
Effects of Faulty Design and Construction on Building Maintenance
,
1996
.
[10]
Randy H. Katz,et al.
Next century challenges: mobile networking for “Smart Dust”
,
1999,
MobiCom.
[11]
Osama Abudayyeh,et al.
As-Built Information Model for Bridge Maintenance
,
2003
.