Hanford currently has 212,000 m 3 (56 million gallons) of highly radioactive mixed waste stored in the Hanford tank farm. This waste will be processed to produce both high-level and low-level activity fractions, both of which are to be vitrified. Supplemental treatment options have been under evaluation for treating portions of the low-activity waste, as well as the liquid secondary waste from the low-activity waste vitrification process. One technology under consideration has been the THOR ® fluidized bed steam reforming process offered by THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC (TTT). As a follow-on effort to TTT’s 2008 pilot plant FBSR non-radioactive demonstration for treating low-activity waste and waste treatment plant secondary waste, TTT, in conjunction with Savannah River National Laboratory, has completed a bench scale evaluation of this same technology on a chemically adjusted radioactive surrogate of Hanford’s waste treatment plant secondary waste stream. This test generated a granular product that was subsequently formed into monoliths, using a geopolymer as the binding agent, that were subjected to compressibility testing, the Product Consistency Test and other leachability tests, and chemical composition analyses. This testing has demonstrated that the mineralized waste form, produced by co-processing waste with kaolin clay using the TTT process, is as durable as low-activity waste glass [1]. Testing has shown the resulting monolith waste form is durable, leach resistant, and chemically stable, and has the added benefit of capturing and retaining the majority of Tc-99, I-129, and other target species at high levels.
[1]
Carol M. Jantzen,et al.
FLUIDIZED BED STEAM REFORMER (FBSR) PRODUCT: MONOLITH FORMATION AND CHARACTERIZATION
,
2006
.
[2]
C. M. Jantzen,et al.
Characterization and Performance of Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) Product as a Final Waste Form
,
2003
.
[3]
John Crank,et al.
The Mathematics Of Diffusion
,
1956
.
[4]
Nikolla P. Qafoku,et al.
Secondary Waste Form Down-Selection Data Package—Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming Waste Form
,
2011
.
[5]
William L. Ebert,et al.
An interlaboratory study of a standard glass for acceptance testing of low-activity waste glass
,
2000
.
[6]
C. L. Crawford,et al.
Evaluation of THOR™Mineralized Waste Forms (Granular and Monolith) for the DOE Advanced Remediation Technologies (ART) Phase 2 Project
,
2010
.
[7]
Burket Paul.
Evaluation of Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) Technology for Sodium Bearing Wastes from Idaho and Hanford Using the Bench-Top Steam Reformer (BSR)
,
2005
.
[8]
A. D. Cozzi,et al.
RADIOACTIVE DEMONSTRATION OF FINAL MINERALIZED WASTE FORMS FOR HANFORD WASTE TREATMENT PLANT SECONDARY WASTE BY FLUIDIZED BED STEAM REFORMING USING THE BENCH SCALE REFORMER PLATFORM
,
2012
.