A Bayesian wavelet packet denoising criterion for mechanical signal with non-Gaussian characteristic

Abstract Three aspects of the traditional Bayesian wavelet packet denoising method have been rarely discussed in the literature for mechanical signals: (1) how to reduce noise if a precise prior description is needed for non-Gaussian data; (2) how to programmatically select a reasonable decomposition level; and (3) how to evaluate the denoising effect from multiple factors. Such three aspects have restricted the enhancement ability of the Bayesian denoising method. To seek the potential of application, this paper tries to establish a set of criteria. It develops the general Bayesian wavelet packet method based on the minimum mean square error, designs two indexes to select the decomposition level, and initially presents how to judge the denoising effect by multi-factor analysis. This criterion has two advantages: (1) if needed, any prior distribution can be employed to match with the signals; and (2) the selected decomposition level can maximize the distinction between real data and noise data. A comparison test is expected to show this enhancement ability of the proposed criterion. Simulated and experimental data demonstrate its excellent performance. This novel method keeps interpretable time-domain features and shows better denoising performance for weak information recognition than the published methods.

[1]  Dehui Yang,et al.  Atomic Norm Minimization for Modal Analysis From Random and Compressed Samples , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Gregoire Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[3]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Bayesian wavelet packet denoising for structural system identification , 2007 .

[4]  David Leporini,et al.  Bayesian wavelet denoising: Besov priors and non-Gaussian noises , 2001, Signal Process..

[5]  A. Sutera,et al.  The mechanism of stochastic resonance , 1981 .

[6]  Dong Wang,et al.  Entropy-Based Method of Choosing the Decomposition Level in Wavelet Threshold De-noising , 2010, Entropy.

[7]  Yuan Zhao,et al.  Wind Speed Prediction of IPSO-BP Neural Network Based on Lorenz Disturbance , 2018, IEEE Access.

[8]  Soosan Beheshti,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian Denoising for General Gaussian Distributed Signals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Y. Lei,et al.  An underdamped stochastic resonance method with stable-state matching for incipient fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings , 2017 .

[10]  Prasanna Kumar Sahu,et al.  Denoising of Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal by using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) with non-local mean (NLM) technique , 2018 .

[11]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Sparse Code Shrinkage: Denoising of Nongaussian Data by Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1999, Neural Computation.

[13]  Xuping Wang,et al.  Multi-mode separation and nonlinear feature extraction of hybrid gear failures in coal cutters using adaptive nonstationary vibration analysis , 2016 .

[14]  Adam Glowacz,et al.  Fault diagnosis of single-phase induction motor based on acoustic signals , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[15]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Wavelet Packet‐Autocorrelation Function Method for Traffic Flow Pattern Analysis , 2004 .

[16]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Theory of stochastic resonance. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[17]  Zhengwei Shen,et al.  Adaptive thresholding hosvd algorithm with iterative regularization for image denoising , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[18]  Delu Zeng,et al.  Mixed noise removal based on a novel non-parametric Bayesian sparse outlier model , 2016, Neurocomputing.