Mission Statements in U.S. Colleges of Business: An Empirical Examination of Their Content With Linkages to Configurations and Performance

Mission statements are an increasingly important component for accreditation of universities and colleges of business. Thus, understanding similarities and differences in the content of mission statements of business schools is especially timely. To provide insights concerning the use of missions in colleges of business, we analyzed the content of mission statements from 408 AACSB schools and explored relations between mission content and measures of business school characteristics, including performance. Overall, there was considerable variance in the content of organizational missions. Using a previously established framework to analyze mission content, we found business school missions generally lacked comprehensiveness. Relying on a quasi-balanced scorecard approach, we found differences in business school performance were related to mission content. Last, we were able to detect distinctions among configurations of business schools in the use of mission statement components and performance. Overall, t...

[1]  Kimberly D. Elsbach.  MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN THE CALIFORNIA CATTLE INDUSTRY - THE CONSTRUCTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VERBAL ACCOUNTS , 1994 .

[2]  C. Bart,et al.  The Relationship between Mission Statements and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[3]  Sharon Kemp,et al.  Mission statements of international airlines: a content analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Robert H. Jantzen,et al.  AACSB Mission-Linked Standards: Effects on the Accreditation Process , 2000 .

[5]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Are you sure you have a strategy , 2001 .

[6]  Penelope J. Yunker.  A Survey of Business School Heads on Mission-Linked AACSB Accreditation Standards , 1998 .

[7]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  The Role of Sampling in Strategic Management Research on Performance: A Two-Study Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Vicki R. Lane,et al.  A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity , 2000 .

[9]  H. Greve.  Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[10]  A. Forehand.  Mission and organizational performance in the healthcare industry. , 2000, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[11]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  Charting the language of leadership: a methodological investigation of President Bush and the crisis of 9/11. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Rikki Abzug,et al.  Institutionalizing Identity: Symbolic Isomorphism and Organizational Names , 2002 .

[13]  H. Thomas,et al.  Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor Definition , 1990 .

[14]  Donna S. Finley,et al.  Beyond the Mission Statement: Alternative Futures for Today's Universities , 2001 .

[15]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  GETTING TO KNOW YOU: A THEORY OF STRATEGIC GROUP IDENTITY , 1997, Strategic Management Journal.

[16]  S. Julian,et al.  Is accreditation good for the strategic decision making of traditional business schools , 2006 .

[17]  James F. Fairbank,et al.  Emulation in Academia: Balancing Structure and Identity , 2001 .

[18]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Do Strategic Groups Differ in Reputation? , 1999 .

[19]  F. David.  How companies define their mission , 1989 .

[20]  A. Huff,et al.  STRATEGIC GROUPS: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 1993 .

[21]  Rebecca J. Morris,et al.  Computerized Content Analysis in Management Research: A Demonstration of Advantages & Limitations , 1994 .

[22]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[23]  G. Luffman,et al.  Mission statements: selling corporate values to employees. , 1991, Long range planning.

[24]  Chiranjeev Kohli,et al.  Corporate identity: The role of mission statements , 1997 .

[25]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  Charisma under Crisis: Presidential Leadership, Rhetoric, and Media Responses Before and After the September 11th Terrorist Attacks , 2004 .

[26]  M. Pratt,et al.  Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities , 2000 .

[27]  A. Raveh,et al.  Conceptual maps of the leading MBA programs in the United States: core courses, concentration areas, and the ranking of the school , 1999 .

[28]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[29]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[30]  R. Shirley.  Identifying the levels of strategy for a college or university , 1983 .

[31]  Colm O'Gorman,et al.  Mission Statements in Small and Medium-Sized Businesses , 1999 .

[32]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Competitive Positioning Withing and Across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary Firms , 2002 .

[33]  G. Medley.  WWF UK creates a new mission , 1992 .

[34]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[35]  R. Ireland,et al.  Mission statements: Importance, challenge, and recommendations for development , 1992 .

[36]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management and Business Policy , 1983 .

[37]  J. Pearce,et al.  Corporate Mission Statements: The Bottom Line , 1987 .

[38]  E. F. Cheit.  Business Schools and Their Critics , 1985 .

[39]  Timothy B. Palmer,et al.  Strategic Responses to Poor Organizational Performance: A Test of Competing Perspectives: , 1999 .

[40]  Timothy B. Palmer,et al.  Managerial Categorization of Competitors: Using Old Maps to Navigate New Environments , 1996 .

[41]  James A. Yunker,et al.  Viewpoint: Doing Things the Hard Way—Problems with Mission-Linked AACSB Accreditation Standards and Suggestions for Improvement , 2000 .

[42]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[43]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Violations of Principle: Ideological Currency in the Psychological Contract , 2003 .

[44]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking during Strategic Change in Academia. , 1996 .

[45]  H. Thomas,et al.  Strategic Groups as Reference Groups: Theory, Modeling and Empirical Examination of Industry and Competitive Strategy , 1995 .

[46]  L. Porter,et al.  Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? , 1988 .

[47]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Justification of Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[48]  Andra Gumbus,et al.  Introducing the Balanced Scorecard: Creating Metrics to Measure Performance , 2005 .

[49]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .

[50]  H. Thomas,et al.  Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers , 1995 .

[51]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Being Good Versus Looking Good: Business School Rankings and the Circean Transformation From Substance to Image , 2002 .

[52]  A. Campbell,et al.  Creating a sense of mission. , 1991, Long range planning.

[53]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE , 1996 .

[54]  K. Glaister,et al.  Business school mission statements—the bland leading the bland? , 1997 .

[55]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Aligning organizational processes with mission: The case of service excellence , 2005 .

[56]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings , 1996 .

[57]  C. Quigley,et al.  A Response to “Beyond the Mission Statement: Alternative Futures for Today's Universities” , 2001 .

[58]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.