Data‐based analysis of bivariate copula tail dependence for drought duration and severity

In recent decades, copula functions have been applied in bivariate drought duration and severity frequency analysis. Among several potential copulas, Clayton has been mostly used in drought analysis. In this research, we studied the influence of the tail shape of various copula functions (i.e. Gumbel, Frank, Clayton and Gaussian) on drought bivariate frequency analysis. The appropriateness of Clayton copula for the characterization of drought characteristics is also investigated. Drought data are extracted from standardized precipitation index time series for four stations in Canada (La Tuque and Grande Prairie) and Iran (Anzali and Zahedan). Both duration and severity data sets are positively skewed. Different marginal distributions were first fitted to drought duration and severity data. The gamma and exponential distributions were selected for drought duration and severity, respectively, according to the positive skewness and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The results of copula modelling show that the Clayton copula function is not an appropriate choice for the used data sets in the current study and does not give more drought risk information than an independent model for which the duration and severity dependence is not significant. The reason is that the dependence of two variables in the upper tail of Clayton copula is very weak and similar to the independent case, whereas the observed data in the transformed domain of cumulative density function show high association in the upper tail. Instead, the Frank and Gumbel copula functions show better performance than Clayton function for drought bivariate frequency analysis. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  V. Keller,et al.  Flow-duration-frequency behaviour of British rivers based on annual minima data , 2003 .

[2]  Mohammad Karamouz,et al.  Development of a Hybrid Index for Drought Prediction: Case Study , 2009 .

[3]  Jose D. Salas,et al.  Characterizing the severity and risk of drought in the Poudre River, Colorado , 2005 .

[4]  C. De Michele,et al.  Analytical calculation of storm volume statistics involving Pareto‐like intensity‐duration marginals , 2004 .

[5]  D. Schindler,et al.  An impending water crisis in Canada's western prairie provinces. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Park,et al.  The impacts of climate change on local hydrology and low flow frequency in the Geum River Basin, Korea , 2011 .

[7]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Meta-elliptical copulas for drought frequency analysis of periodic hydrologic data , 2010 .

[8]  Fateh Chebana,et al.  Multivariate quantiles in hydrological frequency analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Martin F. Lambert,et al.  Drought Analysis Using Trivariate Copulas Conditional on Climatic States , 2010 .

[10]  S. Wagner,et al.  Modelling daily precipitation features in the Volta Basin of West Africa , 2009 .

[11]  Jenq-Tzong Shiau,et al.  Fitting Drought Duration and Severity with Two-Dimensional Copulas , 2006 .

[12]  Inmaculada Pulido-Calvo,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of droughts in Portugal , 2010 .

[13]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  Assessment of hydrological droughts for the Yellow River, China, using copulas , 2007 .

[14]  George Kuczera,et al.  Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors , 2010 .

[15]  Effect of Drought on Urban Water Supplies. II: Water‐Supply Analysis , 1990 .

[16]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Frequency analysis of droughts using the Plackett copula and parameter estimation by genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[17]  R. Modarres,et al.  Frequency Distribution of Extreme Hydrologic Drought of Southeastern Semiarid Region, Iran , 2010 .

[18]  R. B. Leipnik,et al.  Stochastic renewal model of low-flow streamflow sequences , 1996 .

[19]  V. Singh,et al.  Drought modeling-A review , 2011 .

[20]  A. Shabbar,et al.  Summer Drought Patterns in Canada and the Relationship toGlobal Sea Surface Temperatures , 2004 .

[21]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Multicomponent reactive transport in multicontinuum media , 2009 .

[22]  Bill Ravens,et al.  An Introduction to Copulas , 2000, Technometrics.

[23]  Reza Modarres,et al.  Copula‐based drought severity‐duration‐frequency analysis in Iran , 2009 .

[24]  Application stochastique du phénomène d'étiage , 1997 .

[25]  C. Shu,et al.  Regional low‐flow frequency analysis using single and ensemble artificial neural networks , 2009 .

[26]  Richard W. Katz,et al.  Improving the simulation of extreme precipitation events by stochastic weather generators , 2008 .

[27]  S. Nadarajah.  A bivariate pareto model for drought , 2009 .

[28]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Trivariate statistical analysis of extreme rainfall events via the Plackett family of copulas , 2008 .

[29]  R. Modarres.  Regional Frequency Distribution Type of Low Flow in North of Iran by L-moments , 2008 .

[30]  Hsieh Wen Shen,et al.  Recurrence Analysis of Hydrologic Droughts of Differing Severity , 2001 .

[31]  Taha B. M. J. Ouarda,et al.  Identification of temporal trends in annual and seasonal low flows occurring in Canadian rivers: The effect of short- and long-term persistence , 2009 .

[32]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  A bivariate distribution with gamma and beta marginals with application to drought data , 2009 .

[33]  U. Panu,et al.  Analysis of annual hydrological droughts: the case of northwest Ontario, Canada , 2009 .

[34]  C. De Michele,et al.  A Generalized Pareto intensity‐duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2‐Copulas , 2003 .

[35]  Kil Seong Lee,et al.  An Approach for Frequency Analysis of Multiyear Drought Durations , 1986 .

[36]  Taha B. M. J. Ouarda,et al.  Statistical Models and the Estimation of Low Flows , 2008 .

[37]  X. Lana,et al.  Spatial and temporal characterization of annual extreme droughts in Catalonia (northeast Spain) , 1998 .

[38]  Bernard Bobée,et al.  On the tails of extreme event distributions in hydrology , 2008 .

[39]  Zekai Sen,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Hydrologic Critical Droughts , 1980 .

[40]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. , 2010 .

[41]  Jose D. Salas,et al.  Effect of Drought on Urban Water Supplies. I: Drought Analysis , 1990 .

[42]  Marcella Cannarozzo,et al.  Multi-year drought frequency analysis at multiple sites by operational hydrology - A comparison of methods , 2006 .

[43]  R. Vogel,et al.  Probability Distribution of Low Streamflow Series in the United States , 2002 .

[44]  T. McKee,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF DROUGHT FREQUENCY AND DURATION TO TIME SCALES , 1993 .

[45]  K. D. Sharma.  Water resource development in Jamnagar district, Gujarat, India. , 2000 .

[46]  Taesam Lee,et al.  Copula-based stochastic simulation of hydrological data applied to Nile River flows , 2011 .

[47]  U. Panu,et al.  Challenges in drought research: some perspectives and future directions , 2002 .

[48]  M. Sklar.  Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[49]  R. Modarres.  Streamflow drought time series forecasting , 2007 .

[50]  A. Vieli,et al.  Recent dramatic thinning of largest West Antarctic ice stream triggered by oceans , 2004 .

[51]  F. Muller‐Karger,et al.  Phytoplankton Response to Intrusions of Slope Water on the West Florida Shelf: Models and Observations , 2003 .

[52]  J. Salas,et al.  Drought 2002 in Colorado: An Unprecedented Drought or a Routine Drought? , 2005 .

[53]  Giuseppe Passoni,et al.  A multivariate model of sea storms using copulas , 2007 .

[54]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Applied Statistics for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 2008 .