Not so FAST—Chest ultrasound underdiagnoses traumatic pneumothorax

Sensitivity of CXR was 78% compared to 65% with US in CT-confirmed cases of traumatic pneumothorax. 50% of the ptx missed on US required tube thoracostomy. Use of chest US as the primary imaging modality in the initial evaluation of thoracic trauma should be used with caution. BACKGROUND Ultrasonography for trauma is a widely used tool in the initial evaluation of trauma patients with complete ultrasonography of trauma (CUST) demonstrating equivalence to computed tomography (CT) for detecting clinically significant abdominal hemorrhage. Initial reports demonstrated high sensitivity of CUST for the bedside diagnosis of pneumothorax. We hypothesized that the sensitivity of CUST would be greater than initial supine chest radiograph (CXR) for detecting pneumothorax. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with pneumothorax from 2018 through 2020 at a Level I trauma center was performed. Patients included had routine supine CXR and CUST performed prior to intervention as well as confirmatory CT imaging. All CUST were performed during the initial evaluation in the trauma bay by a registered sonographer. All imaging was evaluated by an attending radiologist. Subgroup analysis was performed after excluding occult pneumothorax. Immediate tube thoracostomy was defined as tube placement with confirmatory CXR within 8 hours of admission. RESULTS There were 568 patients screened with a diagnosis of pneumothorax, identifying 362 patients with a confirmed pneumothorax in addition to CXR, CUST, and confirmatory CT imaging. The population was 83% male, had a mean age of 45 years, with 85% presenting due to blunt trauma. Sensitivity of CXR for detecting pneumothorax was 43%, while the sensitivity of CUST was 35%. After removal of occult pneumothorax (n = 171), CXR was 78% sensitive, while CUST was 65% sensitive (p < 0.01). In this subgroup, CUST had a false-negative rate of 36% (n = 62). Of those patients with a false-negative CUST, 50% (n = 31) underwent tube thoracostomy, with 85% requiring immediate placement. CONCLUSION Complete ultrasonography of trauma performed on initial trauma evaluation had lower sensitivity than CXR for identification of pneumothorax including clinically significant pneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy. Using CUST as the primary imaging modality in the initial evaluation of chest trauma should be considered with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Test study, Level IV.

[1]  S. Ianniello,et al.  Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach? , 2019, Journal of Ultrasound.

[2]  M. D. de Moya,et al.  Observing pneumothoraces: The 35-millimeter rule is safe for both blunt and penetrating chest trauma , 2019, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[3]  P. Ferrada,et al.  Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  Zahra A. Premji,et al.  Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  Richard P. Sharpe,et al.  From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment , 2016, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[6]  G. Casola,et al.  Complete ultrasonography of trauma in screening blunt abdominal trauma patients is equivalent to computed tomographic scanning while reducing radiation exposure and cost , 2015, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[7]  S. Ianniello,et al.  First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography , 2014, La radiologia medica.

[8]  G. Caldito,et al.  Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis , 2013, Critical Care.

[9]  Mao Zhang,et al.  Diagnosis of pneumothorax by radiography and ultrasonography: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Chest.

[10]  G. Rozycki,et al.  The accuracy of thoracic ultrasound for detection of pneumothorax is not sustained over time: a preliminary study. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  M. Blaivas,et al.  A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound: its use in clinical practice. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[13]  M. Yousefifard,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest Ultrasonography versus Chest Radiography for Identification of Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, Tanaffos.

[14]  A. El-Menyar,et al.  Utility of Extended FAST in Blunt Chest Trauma: Is it the Time to be Used in the ATLS Algorithm? , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  J. Kortbeek,et al.  Can cervical spine computed tomography assist in detecting occult pneumothoraces? , 2012, Injury.

[16]  M. Stone,et al.  Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. , 2010, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.