Polydisulfide Gd(III) chelates as biodegradable macromolecular magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents

Macromolecular gadolinium (Gd)(III) complexes have a prolonged blood circulation time and can preferentially accumulate in solid tumors, depending on the tumor blood vessel hyperpermeability, resulting in superior contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance (MR) cardiovascular imaging and cancer imaging as shown in animal models. Unfortunately, safety concerns related to these agents’ slow elimination from the body impede their clinical development. Polydisulfide Gd(III) complexes have been designed and developed as biodegradable macromolecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents to facilitate the clearance of Gd(III) complexes from the body after MRI examinations. These novel agents can act as macromolecular contrast agents for in vivo imaging and excrete rapidly as low-molecular-weight agents. The rationale and recent development of the novel biodegradable contrast agents are reviewed here. Polydisulfide Gd(III) complexes have relatively long blood circulation time and gradually degrade into small Gd(III) complexes, which are rapidly excreted via renal filtration. These agents result in effective and prolonged in vivo contrast enhancement in the blood pool and tumor tissue in animal models, yet demonstrate minimal Gd(III) tissue retention as the clinically used low-molecular-weight agents. Structural modification of the agents can readily alter the contrast-enhancement kinetics. Polydisulfide Gd(III) complexes are promising for further clinical development as safe, effective, biodegradable macromolecular MRI contrast agents for cardiovascular and cancer imaging, and for evaluation of therapeutic response.

[1]  D. Parker,et al.  PEG-g-poly(GdDTPA-co-L-cystine): effect of PEG chain length on in vivo contrast enhancement in MRI. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  M. Schabel,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Retention of (Gd-DTPA)-Cystamine Copolymers, a Biodegradable Macromolecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[3]  D. Parker,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced MRI with new biodegradable macromolecular Gd(III) complexes in tumor‐bearing mice , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Walter H Backes,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging kinetic parameters and molecular weight of dendritic contrast agents in tumor angiogenesis in mice. , 2005, Radiology.

[5]  David R Vera,et al.  Gadolinium-DTPA-dextran: a macromolecular MR blood pool contrast agent. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[6]  Hisataka Kobayashi,et al.  Dendrimer-based nanosized MRI contrast agents. , 2004, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[7]  D. Parker,et al.  PEG-g-poly(GdDTPA-co-L-cystine): a biodegradable macromolecular blood pool contrast agent for MR imaging. , 2004, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[8]  A. O. Rodríguez,et al.  Principles of magnetic resonance imaging , 2004 .

[9]  Walter H. Backes,et al.  Multivalent Contrast Agents Based on Gadolinium-Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid-Terminated Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimers for Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004 .

[10]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Pathology: Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels , 2004, Nature.

[11]  D. Parker,et al.  Extracellular biodegradable macromolecular gadolinium(III) complexes for MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  E. W. Meijer,et al.  Multivalent contrast agents based on Gd-DTPA-terminated poly (propylene imine) dendrimers for Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004 .

[13]  Steven J Wang,et al.  Characteristics of a New MRI Contrast Agent Prepared From Polypropyleneimine Dendrimers, Generation 2 , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Jong Hyo Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of postoperative scars and VX2 carcinoma in rabbits: comparison of macromolecular contrast agent and gadopentetate dimeglumine. , 2003, Radiology.

[15]  Hisataka Kobayashi,et al.  Macromolecular MRI contrast agents with small dendrimers: pharmacokinetic differences between sizes and cores. , 2003, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[16]  R Weissleder,et al.  Size optimization of synthetic graft copolymers for in vivo angiogenesis imaging. , 2001, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[17]  Joop A. Peters,et al.  Synthesis, characterization, and relaxivity of two linear Gd(DTPA)-polymer conjugates. , 2001, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[18]  M. Brechbiel,et al.  3D‐micro‐MR angiography of mice using macromolecular MR contrast agents with polyamidoamine dendrimer core with reference to their pharmacokinetic properties , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Debiao Li,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of coronary arteries: comparison of intra- and extravascular contrast agents in swine. , 2001, Radiology.

[20]  D M Shames,et al.  MR imaging characterization of microvessels in experimental breast tumors by using a particulate contrast agent with histopathologic correlation. , 2001, Radiology.

[21]  M. Brechbiel,et al.  Comparison of the macromolecular MR contrast agents with ethylenediamine-core versus ammonia-core generation-6 polyamidoamine dendrimer. , 2001, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[22]  T. Helbich,et al.  A new polysaccharide macromolecular contrast agent for MR imaging: Biodistribution and imaging characteristics , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  S. M. Deneke Thiol-based antioxidants. , 2000, Current topics in cellular regulation.

[24]  T. Helbich,et al.  Prostate cancer tumor grade differentiation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the rat: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media--preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  R. Lauffer,et al.  Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[26]  T. Desser,et al.  Polymeric gadolinium chelate magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: design, synthesis, and properties. , 1999, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[27]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. M. Henrichs,et al.  High relaxivity linear Gd(DTPA)‐polymer conjugates: The role of hydrophobic interactions , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  D M Shames,et al.  Comparison of albumin‐(Gd‐DTPA)30 and Gd‐DTPA‐24‐cascade‐polymer for measurements of normal and abnormal microvascular permeability , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  D M Shames,et al.  Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast-enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologic capillary density. , 1996, Radiology.

[31]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Acute occlusive ischemia of the rat intestine: Early detection by MR imaging with polylysinemgd‐dtpa enhancement , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  Two prototype blood-pool agents for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the portal vein in pigs. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[33]  A. Lindgren,et al.  Effect of thiol oxidation and thiol export from erythrocytes on determination of redox status of homocysteine and other thiols in plasma from healthy subjects and patients with cerebral infarction. , 1995, Clinical chemistry.

[34]  M. Brechbiel,et al.  Biodistribution and metabolism of targeted and nontargeted protein-chelate-gadolinium complexes: evidence for gadolinium dissociation in vitro and in vivo. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[35]  R. Brasch,et al.  Effect of varying the molecular weight of the MR contrast agent Gd‐DTPA‐polylysine on blood pharmacokinetics and enhancement patterns , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  P C Lauterbur,et al.  Dendrimer‐based metal chelates: A new class of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  R Weissleder,et al.  A new macromolecule as a contrast agent for MR angiography: preparation, properties, and animal studies. , 1993, Radiology.

[38]  H. Weinmann,et al.  In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Gd-DTPA-polylysine as a macromolecular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[39]  B. Říhová,et al.  Enzymatic degradation and immunogenic properties of derivatized dextrans. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[40]  M. Moseley,et al.  Evaluation of Gd-DTPA-labeled dextran as an intravascular MR contrast agent: imaging characteristics in normal rat tissues. , 1990, Radiology.

[41]  W. Cacheris,et al.  The relationship between thermodynamics and the toxicity of gadolinium complexes. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[42]  M. Brechbiel,et al.  Gd(DOTA): An alternative to Gd(DTPA) as a T1,2 relaxation agent for NMR imaging or spectroscopy , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1986, Microvascular research.

[44]  T. Brady,et al.  Preparation and water relaxation properties of proteins labeled with paramagnetic metal chelates. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[45]  R. Brasch,et al.  Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  D. Hupe,et al.  EFFECT OF CHARGED SUBSTITUENTS ON RATES OF THE THIOL-DISULFIDE INTERCHANGE REACTION , 1980 .