Implementing renewable energy portfolio standards: The good, the bad, and the ugly in a two state comparison

Understanding how household practices with regard to energy usage change and how to most effectively encourage the adoption of technologies that utilize renewable energy sources at the residential scale are important issues for addressing the environmental impacts of energy use. Here, the social practices model (Spaargaren, 2003) is applied to examine solar technology adopters in two U.S. States who were interviewed about adopting residential solar electric technology and specifically about their experiences with the rebate and incentive programs available to them. Examining the policies and interrogating their potentially unintended consequences from the perspective of the user sheds light on how residential solar incentive programs act as systems of provision, shaping the practices of solar technology adopters, in hopes of improving these incentive programs and effectively encouraging increased residential solar technology adoption. Findings suggest that feed-in tariffs offer additional positive outcomes related to broadening the context for adoption and encouraging future energy conservation while size restrictions, wholesale pricing in net metering agreements, and inconsistent policy mechanisms across utilities in the same state all have potentially unintended negative consequences. Utilizing a perspective attentive to social practice offers a means of improving the design and implementation of energy policy.

[1]  E. Shove.  Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[2]  L. Lutzenhiser.  Social and Behavioral Aspects of Energy use , 1993 .

[3]  M. Small.  `How many cases do I need?' , 2009 .

[4]  Hongtao Yi,et al.  Policy Tool Interactions and the Adoption of State Renewable Portfolio Standards , 2012 .

[5]  Sanya Carley,et al.  Solar set asides and renewable electricity certificates: Early lessons from North Carolina's experience with its renewable portfolio standard , 2012 .

[6]  C. Cremer,et al.  Analysing the effectiveness of renewable energy supporting policies in the European Union , 2006 .

[7]  Arnold Vedlitz,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of the American Planning Association Greening Local Energy: Explaining the Geographic Distribution of Household Solar Energy Use in the United States , 2022 .

[8]  Elizabeth J. Wilson,et al.  Implementing energy efficiency: Challenges and opportunities for rural electric co-operatives and small municipal utilities , 2008 .

[9]  J. Alavalapati,et al.  Is the choice of renewable portfolio standards random , 2007 .

[10]  Loren Lutzenhiser.  The Contours of U.S. Climate Non-Policy , 2001 .

[11]  Paolo Agnolucci,et al.  The effect of financial constraints, technological progress and long-term contracts on tradable green certificates , 2007 .

[12]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels , 2008 .

[13]  David M. Hart,et al.  Making, Breaking, and (Partially) Remaking Markets: State Regulation and Photovoltaic Electricity in New Jersey , 2009 .

[14]  L. Glenna,et al.  From Renewable to Alternative: Waste Coal, the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard, and Public Legitimacy , 2010 .

[15]  R. Shwom,et al.  Changing household consumption to address climate change: social scientific insights and challenges , 2012 .

[16]  Wilson H. Rickerson,et al.  If the shoe FITs: using feed-in tariffs to meet U.S. Renewable electricity targets , 2007 .

[17]  Sanya Carley.  State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness , 2009 .

[18]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[19]  Greg Buckman,et al.  The effectiveness of Renewable Portfolio Standard banding and carve-outs in supporting high-cost types of renewable electricity , 2011 .

[20]  J. Parker,et al.  Consumption Over the Life Cycle , 1999 .

[21]  The rural utility response to Colorado’s electricity mandates , 2011 .

[22]  Gert Spaargaren,et al.  Sustainable technologies and everyday life , 2006 .

[23]  I. Røpke.  Theories of practice -- New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption , 2009 .

[24]  G. Barbose,et al.  Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States - A Status Report with Data Through 2007 , 2008 .

[25]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation , 2007 .

[26]  Elisabeth J. Moyer,et al.  Feasibility of U.S. Renewable Portfolio Standards Under Cost Caps and Case Study for Illinois , 2012 .

[27]  Christopher Cooper,et al.  Big Is Beautiful: The Case for Federal Leadership on a National Renewable Portfolio Standard , 2007 .

[28]  H. Kung.  Impact of deployment of renewable portfolio standard on the electricity price in the State of Illinois and implications on policies , 2012 .

[29]  Andy S. Kydes,et al.  Impacts of a renewable portfolio generation standard on US energy markets , 2007 .

[30]  Simone Espey,et al.  Renewables portfolio standard: a means for trade with electricity from renewable energy sources? , 2001 .

[31]  Haitao Yin,et al.  Do State Renewable Portfolio Standards Promote In-State Renewable Generation? , 2010 .

[32]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[33]  James Blake.  Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience , 1999 .

[34]  Sanya Carley,et al.  The Era of State Energy Policy Innovation: A Review of Policy Instruments , 2011 .

[35]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[36]  R. Wiser,et al.  The renewables portfolio standard in Texas: an early assessment , 2001 .

[37]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[38]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A cultural model of household energy consumption , 1992 .

[39]  Chelsea Schelly,et al.  Testing Residential Solar Thermal Adoption , 2010 .

[40]  K. Palmer,et al.  COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY POLICIES , 2005 .

[41]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The renewable portfolio standard:: design considerations and an implementation survey , 2001 .

[42]  G. Spaargaren.  Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective , 2003, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded Theory in Practice , 1997 .

[44]  Paul Komor,et al.  Limiting the costs of renewable portfolio standards: A review and critique of current methods , 2012 .

[45]  Chris J. Miller,et al.  Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers: A Reassessment of Renewable Portfolio Standards , 2012 .

[46]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Supporting solar power in renewables portfolio standards: Experience from the United States , 2010 .