Randomized opinion dynamics over networks: influence estimation from partial observations

In this paper, we propose a technique for the estimation of the influence matrix in a sparse social network, in which n individual communicate in a gossip way. At each step, a random subset of the social actors is active and interacts with randomly chosen neighbors. The opinions evolve according to a Friedkin and Johnsen mechanism, in which the individuals updates their belief to a convex combination of their current belief, the belief of the agents they interact with, and their initial belief, or prejudice. Leveraging recent results of estimation of vector autoregressive processes, we reconstruct the social network topology and the strength of the interconnections starting from partial observations of the interactions, thus removing one of the main drawbacks of finite horizon techniques. The effectiveness of the proposed method is shown on randomly generation network.

[1]  Chiara Ravazzi,et al.  Learning Influence Structure in Sparse Social Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[2]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[3]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Formal Theory of Reflected Appraisals in the Evolution of Power , 2011 .

[4]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[5]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[6]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[7]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Chiara Ravazzi,et al.  Ergodic Randomized Algorithms and Dynamics Over Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[9]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Estimation in autoregressive processes with partial observations , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[10]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  System identification from partial samples: Non-asymptotic analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  E. Seneta,et al.  Towards consensus: some convergence theorems on repeated averaging , 1977, Journal of Applied Probability.

[13]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Active Sensing of Social Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[14]  M. Newman Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in networks: A user guide , 2016, ArXiv.

[16]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  A Tutorial on Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Social Networks. Part II , 2018, Annu. Rev. Control..

[17]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[18]  J. French A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychology Review.

[19]  Long Wang,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of fairness on graphs with migration. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2013, TEAC.

[21]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  Novel Multidimensional Models of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.