Outcomes after emergency general surgery at teaching versus nonteaching hospitals

BACKGROUND Previous analyses demonstrate teaching hospitals to have worse outcomes raising concerns for quality of care. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals for emergency surgical conditions in a national sample. METHODS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2005–2011) was queried for patients with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions as determined by the American Association for Surgery of Trauma. Outcomes of in-hospital mortality, major complications, length of stay (LOS) and hospital cost were compared between patients presenting to teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. Propensity scores were used to match both groups on demographics, clinical diagnosis, comorbidities, and disease severity. Multivariate regression analyses were performed further adjusting for hospital-level factors including EGS volume. Small effect estimates were further tested using standardized differences. RESULTS A total of 3,707,465 patients from 3,163 centers were included. A majority of patients (59%) (n = 2,187,107) were treated at nonteaching hospitals. After propensity score matching and adjustment, teaching hospitals had a slightly higher odds likelihood of mortality (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.06), slightly lower rate of major complications (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98–0.99), slightly decreased LOS (5.03 days [4.98–5.09] vs. 5.22 days [5.16–5.29]), and slightly higher hospital costs [$12,846 [$12,827–$12,865] vs. $12,304 [12,290–12,318]). Although these differences were statistically significant at p < 0.05, the absolute difference was very small. Further testing of these effect estimates using standardized differences revealed an insignificant difference of 0.5% for mortality, 0.4% for major complications, 0.2% for LOS, and 3.1% for hospital cost. CONCLUSION National estimates of outcomes for EGS conditions demonstrate comparable results between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Concerns regarding quality of care and higher costs at teaching hospitals may be unfounded. Further research to test for differences by specific EGS conditions, operative management, and hospital costs are warranted.

[1]  John A. Cowan,et al.  Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[2]  A. Dobson,et al.  Teaching hospital costs: implications for academic missions in a competitive market. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  Tracey A. Dechert,et al.  Trainee Participation Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[4]  R. D'Agostino.  Adjustment Methods: Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Non‐Randomized Control Group , 2005 .

[5]  Edna A. Viruell-Fuentes.  “IT'S A LOT OF WORK” , 2011, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race.

[6]  M. Hornbrook.  Overview of Disease Severity Measures Disseminated with the Nationwide Inpatient Sample ( NIS ) and Kids ’ Inpatient Database ( KID ) , 2005 .

[7]  J Gibbs,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[8]  B. Carr,et al.  Teaching Status: The Impact on Emergency and Elective Surgical Care in the US , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[9]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Patient Outcomes with Teaching Versus Nonteaching Healthcare: A Systematic Review , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[10]  J. Gold,et al.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  F A Sloan,et al.  Uncovering the high costs of teaching hospitals. , 1986, Health affairs.

[12]  C. Ko,et al.  Comparison of hospital performance in emergency versus elective general surgery operations at 198 hospitals. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  A. May,et al.  A research agenda for emergency general surgery: health policy and basic science. , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[14]  Oscar D. Guillamondegui,et al.  Emergency general surgery: Definition and estimated burden of disease , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[15]  Leonard J Weireter,et al.  Initial implementation of an acute care surgery model: implications for timeliness of care. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  P. Reilly,et al.  Integrating emergency general surgery with a trauma service: impact on the care of injured patients. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  Peter C. Austin,et al.  Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research , 2009, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[18]  HOSPITALS , 1963 .

[19]  A. Nathens,et al.  The Attributable Mortality and Length of Stay of Trauma-Related Complications: A Matched Cohort Study , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[20]  F A Sloan,et al.  Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.