Outcomes Following Microfracture in Grade 3 and 4 Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Ankle

Background: The purpose of this study was to document outcomes following microfracture of articular cartilage lesions of the ankle. Our hypothesis was that patients who underwent ankle microfracture would have good to excellent outcomes. Methods: This study was institutional review board approved. Patients older than 18 years who underwent ankle microfracture surgery for Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 articular cartilage lesions, by a single surgeon, were included. Detailed intraoperative findings were documented at surgery. Patients completed a questionnaire with Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Lysholm, Tegner, and patient satisfaction with outcome. All data were collected prospectively and stored in a data registry and retrospectively reviewed. Forty patients (21 males, 19 females, mean age = 42 years [range, 19-65 years]) were included in this study. Thirteen (33%) had previous ankle surgery. Follow-up was obtained for 94% of patients (n = 34). Mean follow-up time was 26 months (range, 12-48 months). Results: Mean talar defect size was 70 mm2 (range, 4-300 mm2). Mean tibia defect size was 31 mm2 (range, 8-54 mm2). Four patients (10.5%) required subsequent surgery following microfracture surgery. Mean time to second surgery was 17 months (range, 4-32 months). Mean Lysholm score was 74 (range, 31-96). Mean FADI Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was 81 (range, 33-99), FADI Sport was 62 (range, 13-100), and FADI total score was 77 (range, 28-98). Median Tegner was 4 (range, 0-10). Median patient satisfaction was 8 (range, 3-10). Patients who had previous ankle surgery had significantly lower outcome scores versus patients who did not have previous ankle surgery for FADI ADL (70 vs 81, P = .029) and FADI Total (51 vs 77, P = .028). Days from injury to surgery were correlated with age at surgery (r = .323, P = .042) and negatively correlated with FADI ADL (r = −.431, P = .014), FADI Sport (r = −.490, P = .004), FADI Total (r = −.429, P = .014), and Tegner (r = −.402, P = .023). Conclusion: Patients who underwent microfracture for grade 3 or 4 ankle articular cartilage lesions had high patient satisfaction. Patients who had previous ankle surgery had lower postoperative ankle function; however, patient satisfaction remained high. This study supports microfracture for treatment of grade 3 and 4 ankle articular cartilage lesions. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

[1]  N. Caplan,et al.  Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries , 2014 .

[2]  Christopher D Murawski,et al.  Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  P. Deol,et al.  Osteochondral lesions of the talus: size, age, and predictors of outcomes. , 2013, Foot and ankle clinics.

[4]  Kazuki Kanazawa,et al.  Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  T. Roukis,et al.  Outcome of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture as the primary treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  D. Demircioğlu,et al.  Open mosaicplasty in osteochondral lesions of the talus: a prospective study. , 2012, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[7]  D. Villacis,et al.  Fresh osteochondral allograft for the treatment of cartilage defects of the talus: a retrospective review. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  T. Daniels,et al.  AOFAS Position Statement Regarding the Future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems , 2011, Foot & ankle international.

[9]  R. Wilkins,et al.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Treated With Fresh Talar Allografts , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  K. Briggs,et al.  Microfracture: Its History and Experience of the Developing Surgeon. , 2010, Cartilage.

[11]  P. McGahan,et al.  Current Concept Review: Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[12]  M. Zengerink,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus : a systematic review , 2010 .

[13]  B. Morrey Arthroscopic Treatment of Chronic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Long-term Results , 2009 .

[14]  J. Lubowitz,et al.  Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  P. Niemeyer,et al.  Mosaicplasty with Autogenous Talar Autograft for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus after Failed Primary Arthroscopic Management , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. Alford,et al.  Cartilage Restoration, Part 2: Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Directions , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  B. Cole,et al.  Cartilage Restoration, Part 1 , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Michael Harty,et al.  Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. , 1959, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  M. Kocher,et al.  Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  R. Jakob,et al.  Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  D. Koulalis,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Talus , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  B. Hintermann,et al.  Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle , 2000 .

[24]  P. D. Di Cesare,et al.  Repair of articular cartilage defects: part II. Treatment options. , 1999, American journal of orthopedics.

[25]  N. Gould,et al.  Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Talus (Transchondral Fractures of the Talus): Review of the Literature and New Surgical Approach for Medial Dome Lesions , 1985, Foot & ankle.

[26]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale , 1982, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  S. Canale,et al.  Osteochondral lesions of the talus. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Osteochondritis dissecans: the question of etiology. , 1966, The Journal of trauma.

[29]  R. E. Outerbridge The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. , 1961, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.