Individualized non-invasive brain stimulation engages the subgenual anterior cingulate and amygdala

Brain stimulation is used clinically to treat a variety of neurological and psychiatric conditions. The mechanisms of the clinical effects of these brain-based therapies are presumably dependent on their effects on brain networks. It has been hypothesized that using individualized brain network maps is an optimal strategy for defining network boundaries and topologies. Traditional non-invasive imaging can determine correlations between structural or functional time series. However, they cannot easily establish hierarchies in communication flow as done in non-human animals using invasive methods. In the present study, we interleaved functional MRI recordings with non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the attempt to map causal communication between the prefrontal cortex and two subcortical structures thought to contribute to affective dysregulation: the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) and the amygdala. In both cases, we found evidence that these brain areas were engaged when TMS was applied to prefrontal sites determined from each participant’s previous fMRI scan. Specifically, after transforming individual participant images to within-scan quantiles of evoked TMS response, we modeled the average quantile response within a given region across stimulation sites and individuals to demonstrate that the targets were differentially influenced by TMS. Furthermore, we found that the sgACC distributed brain network, estimated in a separate cohort, was engaged in response to sgACC focused TMS and was partially separable from the proximal default mode network response. The amygdala, but not its distributed network, responded to TMS. Our findings indicate that individual targeting and brain response measurements usefully capture causal circuit mapping to the sgACC and amygdala in humans, setting the stage for approaches to noninvasively modulate subcortical nodes of distributed brain networks in clinical interventions and mechanistic human neuroscience studies.

[1]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Prospective Validation That Subgenual Connectivity Predicts Antidepressant Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sites , 2017, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Justin K. Rajendra,et al.  A connectomic approach for subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation surgery: prospective targeting in treatment-resistant depression , 2017, Molecular Psychiatry.

[3]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[4]  Rodrigo M. Braga,et al.  Parallel Interdigitated Distributed Networks within the Individual Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity , 2017, Neuron.

[5]  B. Rothbaum,et al.  PTSD Psychotherapy Outcome Predicted by Brain Activation During Emotional Reactivity and Regulation. , 2017, The American journal of psychiatry.

[6]  B. Rothbaum,et al.  Selective Effects of Psychotherapy on Frontopolar Cortical Function in PTSD. , 2017, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  Rita Z. Goldstein,et al.  Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A systematic review , 2017, NeuroImage.

[8]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Mind control as a guide for the mind , 2016, Nature Human Behaviour.

[9]  A. Roberts,et al.  Beyond the Medial Regions of Prefrontal Cortex in the Regulation of Fear and Anxiety , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[10]  Alberto Llera,et al.  ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Connectivity reveals relationship of brain areas for reward-guided learning and decision making in human and monkey frontal cortex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Quantile rank maps: A new tool for understanding individual brain development , 2015, NeuroImage.

[13]  P. Fox,et al.  Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental illness. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[14]  Justin K. Rajendra,et al.  Defining Critical White Matter Pathways Mediating Successful Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  Jennifer A. Silvers,et al.  Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Conor Liston,et al.  Default Mode Network Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Neural network of cognitive emotion regulation — An ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. Glover,et al.  Causal interactions between fronto-parietal central executive and default-mode networks in humans , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Vincenzo Di Lazzaro,et al.  The contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the functional evaluation of microcircuits in human motor cortex , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[20]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Identification of reproducible individualized targets for treatment of depression with TMS based on intrinsic connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  R. Buckner,et al.  Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targets for Depression Is Related to Intrinsic Functional Connectivity with the Subgenual Cingulate , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  Daniella J. Furman,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and new integration of base line activation and neural response data. , 2012, The American journal of psychiatry.

[23]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  Katherine E. Prater,et al.  Disrupted amygdalar subregion functional connectivity and evidence of a compensatory network in generalized anxiety disorder. , 2009, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Frontal and Parietal Influences on Human Occipital Cortex: Direct Confirmation with Concurrent TMS–fMRI , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Optimizing Functional Accuracy of TMS in Cognitive Studies: A Comparison of Methods , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Desmond J Oathes,et al.  Worry facilitates corticospinal motor response to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, Depression and anxiety.

[29]  C. F. Wu JACKKNIFE , BOOTSTRAP AND OTHER RESAMPLING METHODS IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS ' BY , 2008 .

[30]  A. Etkin,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. , 2007, The American journal of psychiatry.

[31]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Elicits Coupled Neural and Hemodynamic Consequences , 2007, Science.

[32]  G. Glover,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression: Abnormally Increased Contributions from Subgenual Cingulate Cortex and Thalamus , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[33]  Claus C. Hilgetag,et al.  Sequence of information processing for emotions based on the anatomic dialogue between prefrontal cortex and amygdala , 2007, NeuroImage.

[34]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations , 2005 .

[35]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[36]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[37]  A. Lozano,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2005, Neuron.

[38]  S. Bestmann,et al.  On the synchronization of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional echo‐planar imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Activation Studies in PET and fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[40]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual cortex excitability increases during visual mental imagery—a TMS study in healthy human subjects , 2002, Brain Research.

[41]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[42]  E. Gordon,et al.  Arousal Dissociates Amygdala and Hippocampal Fear Responses: Evidence from Simultaneous fMRI and Skin Conductance Recording , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  S. Laughlin,et al.  An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[44]  P. Fox,et al.  Differential limbic–cortical correlates of sadness and anxiety in healthy subjects: implications for affective disorders , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[45]  L. Parsons,et al.  Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[46]  Myunghee C. Paik,et al.  Repeated measurement analysis for nonnormal data in small samples , 1988 .

[47]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[48]  H. White Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .