Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels.

Auditory and vibrotactile stimuli share similar temporal patterns. A psychophysical experiment was performed to test whether this similarity would lead into an intermodal bias in perception of sound intensity. Nine normal-hearing subjects performed a loudness-matching task of faint tones, adjusting the probe tone to sound equally loud as a reference tone. The task was performed both when the subjects were touching and when they were not touching a tube that vibrated simultaneously with the probe tone. The subjects chose on average 12% lower intensities (p < 0.01) for the probe tone when they touched the tube, suggesting facilitatory interaction between auditory and tactile senses in normal-hearing subjects.

[1]  William K. Durfee,et al.  Relative influence of sensory cues in a multi-modal virtual environment , 1999 .

[2]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch , 1998, Current Biology.

[3]  S. Levänen,et al.  Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult , 1998, Current Biology.

[4]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  Basic and applied research on tactile aids for deaf people: Progress and prospects , 1984 .

[5]  S. Levänen,et al.  Feeling vibrations: enhanced tactile sensitivity in congenitally deaf humans , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  J M Weisenberger,et al.  The role of tactile aids in providing information about acoustic stimuli. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Relative performance using haptic and/or touch-produced auditory cues in a remote absolute texture identification task , 2003, 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003. HAPTICS 2003. Proceedings..

[8]  C. Spence,et al.  Tactile “capture” of audition , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Sensory substitution in prosthetics. , 2001, Hand clinics.

[11]  G. Calvert.  Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Jean Vroomen,et al.  Crossmodal integration: a good fit is no criterion , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Lederman.  Auditory Texture Perception , 1979, Perception.

[15]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Activation of the human posterior parietal and temporoparietal cortices during audiotactile interaction , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  R. H. Gault.  TOUCH AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR HEARING IN THE INTERPRETATION AND CONTROL OF SPEECH , 1926 .

[17]  C. Lammertmann,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic Correlates of Audiotactile Interaction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  D K Oller,et al.  Speech perception by congenitally deaf subjects using an electrocutaneous vocoder. , 1988, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Speechreading: illusion or window into pattern recognition , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.