Impact of scale/resolution on evapotranspiration from Landsat and MODIS images

Understanding the role of landscape heterogeneity and its influence on the scaling behavior of surface fluxes as observed by satellite sensors with different spatial resolutions is a critical need to investigate. In this study, the effects of pixel scales on ETc estimation and other parameters that are used to calculate ETc were investigated over different vegetation surfaces in south central Nebraska, USA. Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) was used to estimate spatially distributed ETc by combining ground-based meteorological data for Landsat and MODIS imagery. The estimated surface energy fluxes were compared and validated to the measured Bowen Ratio Energy Balance System (BREBS) ETc fluxes. Validation results showed that Landsat has more preferable spatial resolution (30 m) to map and analyze ETc; regression models explained 91% of the variability in the observed data (RMSD = 0.064 mm/h; MBE = 0.04 mm/h). However, for MODIS-based ETc, the regression model explained only 59% of the variability in observed ETc with a larger error (RMSD = 0.17 mm/h; MBE = 0.15 mm/h). MODIS-based ETc was about 31% higher than the measured ETc. Imperfect assessment in MODIS-based retrievals is due to the underlying assumption of spatial heterogeneity and coarser sensor pixel scale (500 m), which was summarized by up-scaling the Landsat images to MODIS images using output flux aggregation and input up-scaling procedure using simple average and nearest neighbor aggregation techniques and comparisons were made on both image and pixel scales. Aggregation results illustrate that simple average with output flux aggregation provides close interpretation in aggregating fluxes to coarser resolution than other aggregation approaches. Pixel-by-pixel comparison using output aggregation with simple average resulted in close agreement (error range 5%–35%) between measured and up-scaled fluxes, compared to input up-scaling using simple average (error range 25%–60%). Larger error in input up-scaling is due to the changes in the surface roughness parameters due to aggregation in SEBS model. In addition, the magnitude of errors in ETc estimation was observed to be a function of the heterogeneity of the land surface and evaporative elements over the study region. Comparison between up-scaled ETc at 480 m spatial resolution with original MODIS image at 500 m showed that the output aggregation using simple average aggregation method provided closer representation of ETc at 500 m MODIS pixel resolution than the nearest neighbor resampling method.

[1]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Application of multiscale water and energy balance models on a tallgrass prairie , 1994 .

[2]  Suat Irmak,et al.  Application of Remote Sensing for Quantifying and Mapping Surface Energy Fluxes in South Central Nebraska: Analyses with Respect to Field Measurements , 2015 .

[3]  P. J. Mason,et al.  The formation of areally‐averaged roughness lengths , 1988 .

[4]  A. Physique.  Water Resources Research , 2011 .

[5]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An Approach for the Representation of Surface Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models. Part II: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments , 1997 .

[6]  Suat Irmak,et al.  Nebraska Water and Energy Flux Measurement, Modeling, and Research Network (NEBFLUX) , 2010 .

[7]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Effects of spatial aggregation on the multi-scale estimation of evapotranspiration , 2013 .

[8]  John M. Briggs,et al.  The effect of spatial scale on Konza landscape classification using textural analysis , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  Jeroen M. Schoorl,et al.  Three-dimensional landscape process modelling : the effect of DEM resolution , 2000 .

[10]  Chunlin Huang,et al.  Regional estimation of daily to annual regional evapotranspiration with MODIS data in the Yellow River Delta wetland , 2009 .

[11]  Le Jiang,et al.  A satellite-based Daily Actual Evapotranspiration estimation algorithm over South Florida , 2009 .

[12]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Effects of remote sensing pixel resolution on modeled energy flux variability of croplands in Iowa , 2004 .

[13]  Nathaniel A. Brunsell,et al.  Scale issues in land-atmosphere interactions: implications for remote sensing of the surface energy balance , 2003 .

[14]  B. Markham,et al.  Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  Satellite-Based Energy Balance for Mapping Evapotranspiration with Internalized Calibration (METRIC)—Model , 2007 .

[16]  Jing Chen,et al.  Spatial scaling of evapotranspiration as affected by heterogeneities in vegetation, topography, and soil texture , 2006 .

[17]  John L. Monteith,et al.  A four-layer model for the heat budget of homogeneous land surfaces , 1988 .

[18]  Shunlin Liang,et al.  Numerical experiments on the spatial scaling of land surface albedo and leaf area index , 2000 .

[19]  H. E. Jobson.  Evaporation Into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications , 1982 .

[20]  Ramesh K. Singh,et al.  Application of SEBAL Model for Mapping Evapotranspiration and Estimating Surface Energy Fluxes in South-Central Nebraska , 2008 .

[21]  Michael A. Palecki,et al.  Land Surface Temperature product validation using NOAA's surface climate observation networks—Scaling methodology for the Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) , 2012 .

[22]  Massimo Menenti,et al.  Aggregation effects of surface heterogeneity in land surface processes , 1999 .

[23]  Dan Chen,et al.  Grid-size effects on estimation of evapotranspiration and gross primary production over a large Loess Plateau basin, China , 2009 .

[24]  A. Holtslag,et al.  A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL)-1. Formulation , 1998 .

[25]  Yohay Carmel,et al.  Controlling data uncertainty via aggregation in remotely sensed data , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[26]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches , 2011 .

[27]  Ronald L. Elliott,et al.  Scaling effects on modeled surface energy-balance components using the NOAH-OSU land surface model , 2003 .

[28]  Ferran Marqués,et al.  Automatic satellite image georeferencing using a contour-matching approach , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  José A. Sobrino,et al.  Land surface temperature retrieval from LANDSAT TM 5 , 2004 .

[30]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey , 2000, Ecological Economics.

[31]  Z. Su.  The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[32]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  How sensitive is SEBAL to changes in input variables, domain size and satellite sensor? , 2011 .

[33]  M. Raupach.  Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces , 1992 .

[34]  E. Walter-Shea,et al.  Comparison and analysis of empirical equations for soil heat flux for different cropping systems and irrigation methods , 2011 .

[35]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Modeling Evapotranspiration during SMACEX: Comparing Two Approaches for Local- and Regional-Scale Prediction , 2005 .

[36]  Mohsin Hafeez,et al.  Retrieved actual ET using SEBS model from Landsat-5 TM data for irrigation area of Australia , 2012 .

[37]  J. Wieringa.  Roughness‐dependent geographical interpolation of surface wind speed averages , 1986 .

[38]  SEBS module BEAM : a practical tool for surface energy balance estimates from remote sensing data , 2008 .

[39]  J. Hogg.  Quantitative remote sensing of land surfaces , 2004 .

[40]  M. Seyfried,et al.  Scale and the Nature of Spatial Variability: Field Examples Having Implications for Hydrologic Modeling , 1995 .

[41]  A. Salim Bawazir,et al.  Estimating Daily Net Radiation over Vegetation Canopy through Remote Sensing and Climatic Data , 2007 .

[42]  Zhanqing Li,et al.  Estimation of evaporative fraction from a combination of day and night land surface temperatures and NDVI: A new method to determine the Priestley-Taylor parameter , 2006 .

[43]  N. Lam,et al.  On the Issues of Scale, Resolution, and Fractal Analysis in the Mapping Sciences* , 1992 .

[44]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[45]  C. Paulson.  The Mathematical Representation of Wind Speed and Temperature Profiles in the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer , 1970 .

[46]  M. S. Moran,et al.  The scaling characteristics of remotely-sensed variables for sparsely-vegetated heterogeneous landscapes , 1997 .

[47]  Ling Bian,et al.  Comparing Effects of Aggregation Methods on Statistical and Spatial Properties of Simulated Spatial Data , 1999 .

[48]  Chansheng He,et al.  Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. II: Application , 2005 .

[49]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Scale influences on the remote estimation of evapotranspiration using multiple satellite sensors , 2006 .

[50]  M. Raupach.  Vegetation-atmosphere interaction and surface conductance at leaf, canopy and regional scales , 1995 .

[51]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  DEM aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling , 1993 .

[52]  W. Massman.  Molecular diffusivities of Hg vapor in air, O2 and N2 near STP and the kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of air near STP , 1999 .

[53]  Gyanesh Chander,et al.  Revised Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper Radiometric Calibration , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[54]  Massimo Menenti,et al.  S-SEBI: A simple remote sensing algorithm to estimate the surface energy balance , 2000 .

[55]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An Approach for the Representation of Surface Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models. Part I: Theoretical Framework , 1997 .

[56]  Neil A. Dodgson,et al.  Quadratic interpolation for image resampling , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[57]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites , 2008 .

[58]  E. K. Webb.  Profile relationships: The log‐linear range, and extension to strong stability , 1970 .

[59]  Nathaniel A. Brunsell,et al.  Characterizing the multi–scale spatial structure of remotely sensed evapotranspiration with information theory , 2011 .

[60]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Up-scaling of SEBAL derived evapotranspiration maps from Landsat (30 m) to MODIS (250 m) scale , 2009 .

[61]  Monique Y. Leclerc,et al.  Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation , 1990 .

[62]  Inge Sandholt,et al.  Estimation of regional evapotranspiration over the North China Plain using geostationary satellite data , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.