论文信息 - Self-report scales alone cannot capture mental workload - 字舞流文

Self-report scales alone cannot capture mental workload

Mental workload is an operational concept that can only be assessed indirectly. Self-reports such as the NASA-TLX however will never suffice to describe how a task was performed, and how heavily loaded operators were.

Ben Lewis-Evans | Dick de Waard

[1] Jacques Leplat,et al. Hollnagel, E. (2009). The ETTO Principle: Efficiency - Thoroughness Trade - Off. Why things that go right sometimes go wrong? . Farnham (U.K.): Ashgate , 2009 .

[2] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. Controversy in human factors constructs and the explosive use of the NASA-TLX: a measurement perspective , 2014, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[3] E. Hollnagel. The Etto Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong , 2009 .

[4] Jens Rasmussen,et al. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5] Ari Widyanti,et al. Adaptation of the Rating Scale Mental Effort (RSME) for use in Indonesia , 2013 .

[6] H. Gr. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. , 1997 .

[7] G. R. J. Hockey. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[8] Dick de Waard,et al. The measurement of drivers' mental workload , 1996 .

[9] K. A. BROOKHUIS,et al. Criteria for driver impairment , 2003, Ergonomics.