Turning good research into good publications

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a basic list of items that many standard empirical papers need and to highlight some common and fixable problems, as well as some corresponding suggestions and solutions such that authors can turn good research into good papers that have an improved chance of publication. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is a conceptual study on publishing, though it draws heavily on two of the authors' experience as editors of major management journals and their past work on paper organization and research design. A number of helpful resources for authors have also been provided from the academic literature – both journals and books – so that this paper can be a helpful resource to authors in organizing and preparing their work to submit to an appropriate journal. Findings - This paper's findings are listed as follows. First, prospective authors will gain a much clearer understanding of whether a journal is an appropriate outlet for their work by reading the journal's aims and scope. Second, a good Introduction is a crucial element of a paper and must contain key basic information such as the research question (or thesis statement), a mini-literature review that situates the paper in past work, a quick summary of results, and the paper's contributions. Third, in the Literature Review or Theory section, it is important to review the development of the more relevant literature in the chosen topic, the key empirical or case findings, and why the focal paper seeks to enter the field at this time. Fourth, in the Method section, authors should try to provide as much helpful descriptive data as space permits. Fifth, in the Results section, authors should present the results for each hypotheses one by one, but limit the discussion in that section to the results and some brief explanation. Additionally, the Discussion section should have four parts including the contributions, limitations of the research, future research, and any other unusual findings. Finally, many papers suffer from formatting problems or do not fit the aims and scope of the target journal. Authors should be careful to check on these issues before submission. Originality/value - This paper is complementary to works on methods and research design in that it helps authors with the important step of organizing their papers to turn good research into good manuscripts with a better chance of publication.

[1]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  On the types of papers the Asia Pacific Journal of Management generally publishes , 2012 .

[2]  Dov Eden Navigate the Review Process Successfully: Understanding and Managing the Editor's Dilemma , 2008 .

[3]  Wangbin Hu,et al.  New venture capability of the transformation from entrepreneurial orientation to new venture's performance: Theory model and empirical study in China , 2012 .

[4]  Lawrence A. Machi,et al.  The literature review : six steps to success , 2009 .

[5]  Yiyuan Mai,et al.  Is work experience helpful to the success of venture creation , 2012 .

[6]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 4: Grounding Hypotheses , 2011 .

[7]  Marta A. Geletkanycz,et al.  Publishing in AMJ–Part 6: Discussing the Implications , 2012 .

[8]  Mike W. Peng Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices , 2003 .

[9]  Sheldon Zedeck Editing a Top Academic Journal , 2008 .

[10]  Martin Kilduff,et al.  Editor's comments: The top ten reasons why your paper might not be sent out for review , 2007 .

[11]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Several key reasons why a paper is likely to be rejected at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 2012 .

[12]  S. Rynes,et al.  What Makes Management Research Interesting, And Why Does It Matter? , 2006 .

[13]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Clearing the first hurdle at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 2010 .

[14]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective , 2008 .

[15]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[16]  Anne Sigismund Huff Designing research for publication , 2008 .

[17]  J. Colquitt,et al.  TRENDS IN THEORY BUILDING AND THEORY TESTING: A FIVE-DECADE STUDY OF THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL , 2007 .

[18]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[19]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Replication and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective , 1999 .

[20]  Saul Estrin,et al.  Institutions, resources and entry strategies in emerging economies , 2009 .

[21]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Some helpful sources for prospective authors in Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 2011 .

[22]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? , 2009 .

[23]  Ge Zhu,et al.  An empirical study of consumer adoption on 3G value‐added services in China , 2012 .

[24]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization , 1976 .

[25]  Katherine J. Klein,et al.  Introduction to the Special Section on Theoretical Models and Conceptual Analyses: Theory in Applied Psychology: Lessons (Re)Learned. , 2004 .

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2007 .

[27]  Gerry McNamara,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 2: Research Design , 2011 .

[28]  Hongdan Zhao,et al.  Does organization citizenship behavior really benefit the organization , 2012 .

[29]  Xiaoping Chu,et al.  People value for team effectiveness in China: The mediating role of leader identification , 2012 .

[30]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  Entrepreneurship, poverty, and Asia: Moving beyond subsistence entrepreneurship , 2014, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[31]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[32]  Chung L. Huang Publish or Perish! An Editorial Perspective , 2007, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[33]  Daniel C. Feldman Being A Developmental Reviewer: Easier Said Than Done , 2004 .

[34]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development , 2006 .

[35]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[36]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 2010 .

[37]  D. Ahlstrom Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society , 2010 .

[38]  Peter J. Williamson,et al.  Varieties of Corporatism: A Conceptual Discussion , 1985 .

[39]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the Hook , 2011 .

[40]  Mike W. Peng Improving Made-in-China Management Research , 2012 .

[41]  Gerard George,et al.  Publishing in AMJ: Part 1: Topic choice: From the Editors , 2011 .

[42]  A. Huff Writing for scholarly publication , 1998 .

[43]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 7: What's Different about Qualitative Research? , 2012 .

[44]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 5: Crafting the Methods and Results , 2012 .