Four varieties of comparative analysis

The article starts by examining the definition of comparative analysis and what distinguishes it from analysis in general. It then identifies four varieties of comparative analysis according to (a) whether they aim to explain differences or similarities and (b) the assumptions they make about the underlying causal patterns present. While the former contrast is well known, it is argued that the latter contrast is fundamental and opens up many possible avenues for comparative analysis, which would otherwise be closed. Although the examples are drawn from the housing and urban studies field, the argument is of general applicability. The article considers in turn what is meant by comparative analysis, its main varieties, the research designs needed to undertake it, and some of the problems that arise.

[1]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[2]  A. Przeworski,et al.  The logic of comparative social inquiry , 1970 .

[3]  A. Sayer.  Method in Social Science , 1992 .

[4]  R. Boudon.  L'analyse mathématique des faits sociaux , 1967 .

[5]  M. Kohn,et al.  CROSS-NATIONAL RESEARCH AS AN ANALYTIC STRATEGY* American. Sociological Association, 1987 Presidential Address , 1987 .

[6]  Leslie Kish,et al.  Some Statistical Problems in Research Design , 1959 .

[7]  J. Mill.  A System of Logic , 1843 .

[8]  C. Pickvance.  Democratisation and the Decline of Social Movements: The Effects of Regime Change on Collective Action in Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Latin America , 1999 .

[9]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-Type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies , 1994 .

[10]  Raymond Boudon.  The logic of sociological explanation , 1974 .

[11]  Jeffery M. Paige.  Conjuncture, Comparison, and Conditional Theory in Macrosocial Inquiry1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method , 1934, Nature.

[13]  I. Szelenyi.  Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism , 1983 .

[14]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons , 1986 .

[15]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases , 1991 .

[16]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  What is the Case? , 1957 .

[17]  C. Pickvance.  Comparative urban analysis and assumptions about causality , 1986 .

[18]  J. Davis,et al.  Elementary Survey Analysis , 1972 .