In a few months students from almost every single country will be taking high-stakes tests such as the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), International English Testing System (IELTS), Business Language Testing Service (BULATS), and others in order to achieve a score that allows them to pursue their studies abroad. Students who want to pursue graduate studies in the United States will be able to choose from a number of tests to prove their proficiency level, but, up to now, the most important test has been the TOEFL. The TOEFL, like other exams, has been progressively converted into a computer-based test (CBT), first, and into an Internet-based test (iBT) later. Most students today take a computer version of this test. The promptness of the rating system as compared to the traditional paperand-pencil format have helped to popularize the CBT and iBT versions of TOEFL. Many of the other high-stakes tests have followed or are following this change. Probably, the second most important highstakes exam is IELTS, whose computerized version is currently being used experimentally in several countries as a first stage of implementation.
[1]
Jesús García Laborda.
PLEVALEX - A new platform for Oral Testing in Spanish
,
2006,
The EuroCALL Review.
[2]
Michael L. Kamil,et al.
The Practicality and Efficiency of Web-Based Placement Testing for College-Level Language Programs.
,
2004
.
[3]
M. Chodorow,et al.
BEYOND ESSAY LENGTH: EVALUATING E-RATER®'S PERFORMANCE ON TOEFL® ESSAYS
,
2004
.
[4]
A. Davies.
Three heresies of language testing research
,
2003
.
[5]
Jaeyool Boo,et al.
Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test
,
2003
.
[6]
Carsten Roever,et al.
WEB-BASED LANGUAGE TESTING
,
2001
.
[7]
James Dean Brown,et al.
Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions
,
1997
.
[8]
Glenn Fulcher,et al.
lnterface design in computer-based language testing
,
2011
.
[9]
Carol A. Chapelle,et al.
Assessing Language through Computer Technology: Evaluating CALT
,
2006
.
[10]
Kathleen M. Bailey,et al.
Washback in language testing
,
1999
.