Theories of Risk: Testing Investor Behavior on the Taiwan Stock and Stock Index Futures Markets

This article considers four utility functions - concave, convex, S‐shaped, and reverse S‐shaped - to analyze the behavior of different types of investors on the Taiwan stock index and its corresponding index futures. Using stochastic dominance (SD) rules, we show that the existence of all four investor types is plausible. Risk averters prefer spot to futures, whereas risk seekers prefer futures to spot. Investors with S‐shaped utility functions prefer spot (futures) to futures (spot) when markets move upward (downward). Investors with reverse S‐shaped utility functions prefer futures (spot) to spot (futures) when markets move upward (downward). We show that both spot and futures markets can exist when only risk averters are present, but futures can dominate spot only if there is some risk‐seeking behavior. These results are robust with respect to subperiods, spot returns including dividends, and diversification.

[1]  Songsak Sriboonchitta,et al.  Stochastic Dominance and Applications to Finance, Risk and Economics , 2017 .

[2]  Lixing Zhu,et al.  Moment Conditions for Almost Stochastic Dominance , 2013 .

[3]  Ephraim Clark,et al.  An empirical analysis of marginal conditional stochastic dominance , 2012 .

[4]  Jack L. Treynor.  How to Rate Management of Investment Funds , 2012 .

[5]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Empirical test of the efficiency of the UK covered warrants market: Stochastic dominance and likelihood ratio test approach , 2012 .

[6]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Prospect Performance Evaluation: Making a Case for a Non-Asymptotic UMPU Test , 2011 .

[7]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Do Investors Like to Diversify? A Study of Markowitz Preferences , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Ephraim Clark,et al.  Making Inefficient Market Indices Efficient , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  H. Levy.  Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty , 2010 .

[10]  Martín Egozcue,et al.  Prospect Theory, Indifference Curves, and Hedging Risks , 2010 .

[11]  W. Wong,et al.  Empirical Test of the Efficiency of UK Covered Warrants Market: Stochastic Dominance and Likelihood Ratio Test Approach , 2010 .

[12]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Gains from diversification on convex combinations: A majorization and stochastic dominance approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Market Efficiency of Oil Spot and Futures: A Mean-Variance and Stochastic Dominance Approach , 2010 .

[14]  H. Lean,et al.  Stochastic dominance and behavior towards risk: The market for Internet stocks , 2008 .

[15]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Preferences over location-scale family , 2008 .

[16]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  The sizes and powers of some stochastic dominance tests: A Monte Carlo study for correlated and heteroskedastic distributions , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[17]  H. Levy,et al.  Risk aversion and skewness preference , 2008 .

[18]  H. Lean,et al.  Stochastic dominance analysis of Asian hedge funds , 2008 .

[19]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Gains from Diversification: A Majorization and Stochastic Dominance Approach , 2008 .

[20]  Hua Li,et al.  Test Statistics for Prospect and Markowitz Stochastic Dominances with Applications , 2007 .

[21]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Stochastic dominance and mean-variance measures of profit and loss for business planning and investment , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Stochastic Dominance Analysis of iShares , 2007 .

[23]  H. Levy,et al.  Does Risk Seeking Drive Stock Prices? A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Aggregate Investor Preferences and Beliefs , 2005 .

[24]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Preferences Over Meyer's Location-Scale Family , 2005 .

[25]  Raymond H. Chan,et al.  Prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance , 2005 .

[26]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  International momentum strategies: a stochastic dominance approach , 2005 .

[27]  M. Statman,et al.  The Diversification Puzzle , 2004 .

[28]  Uwe Mackenroth.  Representation of Uncertainty , 2004 .

[29]  Ale Smidts,et al.  The Shape of Utility Functions and Organizational Behavior , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Moshe Levy,et al.  Prospect Theory: Much Ado About Nothing? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Moshe Leshno,et al.  Preferred by "All" and Preferred by "Most" Decision Makers: Almost Stochastic Dominance , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Lisa Farrell,et al.  Can Expected Utility Theory Explain Gambling , 2002 .

[33]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[34]  Chi-Kwong Li,et al.  Extension of stochastic dominance theory to random variables , 1999, RAIRO Oper. Res..

[35]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  A note on convex stochastic dominance , 1999 .

[36]  Zvi Wiener,et al.  Stochastic Dominance and Prospect Dominance with Subjective Weighting Functions , 1998 .

[37]  R. Davidson,et al.  Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality , 1998 .

[38]  C. Plott,et al.  Exchange Economies and Loss Exposure: Experiments Exploring Prospect Theory and Competitive Equilibria in Market Environments , 1997 .

[39]  S. T. Ong,et al.  Behavioral aspect of design and marketing of financial products , 1995 .

[40]  S. Yitzhaki,et al.  Marginal conditional stochastic dominance , 1994 .

[41]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[42]  Hersh Shefrin,et al.  Behavioral aspects of the design and marketing of financial products , 1993 .

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[44]  Paul D. Thistle,et al.  Convergence of the South and non-South income distributions 1969-1979. , 1992 .

[45]  R. Thaler,et al.  Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice , 1990 .

[46]  Haim Levy,et al.  Market reaction to quarterly earnings' announcements: a stochastic dominance based test of market efficiency , 1989 .

[47]  P. Fishburn.  Stochastic Dominance in Nonlinear Utility Theory , 1989 .

[48]  Robert A. Jarrow,et al.  The Relationship between Arbitrage and First Order Stochastic Dominance , 1986 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[50]  P. Fishburn,et al.  TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS* , 1979 .

[51]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[52]  D. Bunn.  Stochastic Dominance , 1979 .

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory. An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk , 1977 .

[54]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[55]  H. Levy,et al.  Efficiency analysis of choices involving risk , 1969 .

[56]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios , 1969 .

[57]  P. Samuelson.  General Proof that Diversification Pays , 1967, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[58]  C. Williams.  Attitudes toward Speculative Risks as an Indicator of Attitudes toward Pure Risks , 1966 .

[59]  W. Sharpe.  CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[60]  J. Quirk,et al.  Admissibility and Measurable Utility Functions , 1962 .

[61]  H. Markowitz.  The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[62]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[63]  J. Menken,et al.  A Treatise, on Money , 1931, Nature.