Fostering the determinants of knowledge transfer: a team-level analysis

The research area of knowledge transfer is a critical one in the current era of the knowledge economy. Previous studies have channelled much effort into understanding how knowledge transfer could be facilitated efficiently. Yet most of these studies conducted research only at the individual level, ignoring the fact that, in many organizations, the team now serves as the basic unit for transferring and preserving knowledge. In addition, these studies have not put much emphasis on the learning side of knowledge transfer. This study attempts to fill the gaps left by previous studies. First, we identify two determinants of knowledge transfer, namely, knowledge sharing and learning intensity. Furthermore, we discuss how to efficiently foster knowledge sharing and learning intensity at the team level from the perspective of social capital. Finally, we conduct an empirical survey to examine relationships among the components of social capital (i.e. trust and social interaction), and knowledge sharing and learning intensity.

[1]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[2]  D. Weiss,et al.  Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. , 1967 .

[3]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[4]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[5]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[6]  M. Clark,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. , 1979 .

[7]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[8]  Journal of Information Science , 1984 .

[9]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[10]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  M. Clark,et al.  Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. H. Myers.  Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[13]  D. Mackie,et al.  Intergroup relations. , 2019, Annual Review of Psychology.

[14]  M. Clark,et al.  Keeping Track of Needs and Inputs of Friends and Strangers , 1989 .

[15]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[16]  M. Diehl.  The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings , 1990 .

[17]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Research that reinvents the corporation , 1991 .

[18]  Paul L. Schindler,et al.  The Structure of Interpersonal Trust in the Workplace , 1993 .

[19]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[20]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[21]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[22]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[23]  S. Robinson.  Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[24]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  The World-Wide-Web as social hypertext , 1996, CACM.

[25]  Andreas Dieberger,et al.  Supporting social navigation on the World Wide Web , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  G. Roth,et al.  How to make experience your company's best teacher. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[27]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[28]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[29]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[30]  S. Mann.  Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1999 .

[31]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[32]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[33]  R. McDermott.  Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[34]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[35]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2000 .

[36]  T. Goh.  Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisation , 2000 .

[37]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[38]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[39]  P. Duguid,et al.  Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[40]  W. Kennan,et al.  Social capital: reconceptualizing the bottom line , 2000 .

[41]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[42]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[43]  C. Argyris.  Teaching Smart People How to Learn , 2002 .

[44]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Borrowed theory: Applying exchange theories in information science research , 2003 .

[45]  Mark O. Riedl,et al.  Social navigation: modeling, simulation, and experimentation , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[46]  Hannu Vanharanta,et al.  Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context , 2003 .

[47]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks , 2003 .

[48]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[49]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[50]  Jyh-Jeng Wu.  Influence of market orientation and strategy on travel industry performance: an empirical study of e-commerce in Taiwan , 2004 .

[51]  J. Kratzer,et al.  Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative , 2005 .

[52]  Jette Hyldegård,et al.  Collaborative information behaviour--exploring Kuhlthau's Information Search Process model in a group-based educational setting , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..