Students' perceptions of Blackboard and Moodle in a Portuguese university

The use of learning management systems (LMS) has grown considerably in universities around the world. The University of Minho (UM) has pioneered in this area in Portugal, adopting Blackboard as its official LMS. Moodle is also used in UM in scattered initiatives, allowing for interesting comparisons. Previous studies comparing Blackboard and Moodle have been confined to limited samples and focused on students' perceptions only. In this paper, we also try to relate those perceptions to the impact of the LMSs on student level of engagement. We assess the extent and depth of use of the two LMSs, presenting the results of a study of students' perceptions and experience with both Blackboard and Moodle. Unlike previous studies, more students (46.5%) stated a preference for Blackboard over Moodle, while 34.7% preferred Moodle, and nearly 20% had no preference. Factors that might explain these results are explored in some detail. By and large, a basic utilisation is made of both platforms, as little more than electronic document repositories, in what Francis and Raftery, in 2005, designate as a Mode 1 level of engagement. We could, however, detect some instances of a more sophisticated Mode 2 utilisation, particularly with Moodle, underlining the role of faculty in integrating a sophisticated use of LMSs when designing their courses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  A. Agresti Categorical data analysis , 1993 .

[2]  Mark Nichols,et al.  Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Beate List,et al.  An evaluation of open source e-learning platforms stressing adaptation issues , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[4]  R. A. Groeneveld,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed). , 1981 .

[5]  M. Machado,et al.  Blackboard vs. moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.

[6]  D. Bremer,et al.  A Comparison of Two Learning management Systems : Moodle vs Blackboard , 2005 .

[7]  Oleg Liber,et al.  A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of eLearning environments , 2004 .

[8]  David M. Kennedy Challenges in evaluating Hong Kong students perceptions of Moodle , 2005 .

[9]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Managing content in e-learning environments , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Frances Deepwell,et al.  On campus, but out of class: an investigation into students’ experiences of learning technologies in their self-directed study , 2008 .

[11]  Norshidah Mohamed,et al.  E-Learning acceptance in a developing country: A case of the Indonesian Open University , 2007 .

[12]  Judy Drennan,et al.  Factors Affecting Student Attitudes Toward Flexible Online Learning in Management Education , 2005 .

[13]  I. Brown Individual and Technological Factors Affecting Perceived Ease of Use of Web‐based Learning Technologies in a Developing Country , 2002, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[14]  Joanne Louise Badge,et al.  e-Learning versus e-Teaching: Seeing the Pedagogic Wood for the Technological Trees , 2005 .