Modular Production and the New Division of Labour Within Europe

This article focuses on the emergence of a new international division of labour in the auto parts industry. Its first section examines the hypothesis that the shift to modular production offers a chance to modify value chain geography inasmuch as modularity causes new opportunities and constraints in geographic proximity terms. An analytical matrix is provided and applied to New Accession Countries, with special consideration being given to French suppliers' circumstances due to the requirement that host country characteristics and company specificities be analysed simultaneously. The second section tests this matrix using statistical data and culminates in a case-study. It will be demonstrated that New Accession Countries are being integrated with the rest of the Continent, due to firms' ongoing search for location-related advantages and because of a tightening/easing interaction that is associated with proximity constraints.

[1]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[2]  François Fourcade,et al.  The role of 1st tier suppliers in automobile product modularisation: the search for a coherent strategy , 2005 .

[3]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[4]  Anders Larsson The development and regional significance of the automotive industry: supplier parks in western Europe , 2002 .

[5]  David Sadler,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIES OF JUST-IN-TIME: JAPANESE INVESTMENT AND THE AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS INDUSTRY IN WESTERN EUROPE. , 1994 .

[6]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to national systems of innovation , 2010 .

[7]  Yannick Lung,et al.  The coordination of competencies and knowledge: a critical issue for regional automotive systems , 2001 .

[8]  P. Pavlínek,et al.  Regional Restructuring of the Škoda Auto Supplier Network in the Czech Republic , 2007 .

[9]  A. Davies,et al.  Systems Integration: a Core Capability of the Modern Corporation , 2022 .

[10]  Andrea Prencipe,et al.  The Business of Systems Integration , 2004 .

[12]  Bruce M Belzowski,et al.  Supply chain management: new competitive realities in the automotive value chain , 2006 .

[13]  C. Carrincazeaux,et al.  Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities , 2001 .

[14]  Jorge Carrillo,et al.  Transnational Strategies and Regional Development: The Case of GM and Delphi in Mexico , 2004 .

[15]  Vincent Frigant,et al.  Geographical proximity and supplying relationships in modular production , 2002 .

[16]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[17]  Jean-Bernard Layan L'innovation péricentrale dans l'industrie automobile : une gestion territoriale du risque de résistance au changement , 2006 .

[18]  Yannick Lung,et al.  New Spatial Configurations in the European Automobile Industry , 1996 .

[19]  Vincent Frigant,et al.  Winners and losers in the auto parts industry: trajestories followed by the main First Tier Suppliers over the past decade , 2009 .

[20]  Y. Lung The changing geography of the European automobile system , 2004 .

[21]  Yannick Lung,et al.  Innovation institutionnelle, apprentissage organisationnel et contrainte de proximites : Les enseignements de la geographie du juste-a-temps , 1993 .

[22]  C. R. Estall,et al.  Stock control in manufacturing: The just-in-time system and its locational implications. , 1985 .

[23]  J. Humphrey Assembler-Supplier Relations in the Auto Industry: Globalisation and National Development , 2000 .

[24]  Y. Lung,et al.  Les nouvelles configurations de l'espace automobile méditerranéen , 2007 .

[25]  G. Volpato,et al.  The OEM-FTS relationship in automotive industry , 2004 .

[26]  Yannick Lung,et al.  Innovation and Proximity , 1999 .

[27]  Mário Vale Innovation and Knowledge Driven by a Focal Corporation , 2004 .