Exploring Portuguese Academics' Understanding of Ownership and Intellectual Property of Online Educational Materials

This article presents the results of an exploratory study that investigates how academics perceive the impact of e-learning systems in the ownership and intellectual property of educational materials. It has been inductively discovered that academics are uncomfortable with the idea of uncontrolled pick up and use of educational resources by third parties, including the institutions they are affiliated with. The main reasons for this mistrust are associated with perceptions of ownership and intellectual property, resources integrity and perceived insufficient institutional support. Two suggestions are advanced to counter academics' mistrust about making educational materials available through e-learning systems: i the institutional recognition and accreditation of the development of high-quality online teaching resources; ii and the clarification of legal ambiguities concerning this type of ownership and intellectual property, through the creation of clear institutional rules and negotiation of institutional policies.

[1]  Pedro Teixeira,et al.  The rise and fall of the private sector in Portuguese higher education , 2000 .

[2]  Camille Dickson-Deane,et al.  e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Kelly Edmonds.  Off with their heads! Copyright infringement in the Canadian online higher educational environment , 2006 .

[4]  Carol A. Twigg.  Who Owns Online Courses and Course Materials? Intellectual Property Policies for a New Learning Environment. Pew Symposia in Learning and Technology (2nd, Miami, Florida, February 17-18, 2000). , 2000 .

[5]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[6]  Anne H. Moore.  Lens on the Future: Open-Source Learning , 2002 .

[7]  Jörg Sydow,et al.  How Can Systems Trust Systems? A Structuration Perspective on Trust-Building in Inter-Organizational Relations , 2006 .

[8]  Tina N. Hohlfeld,et al.  An Analysis of Copyright Policies for Distance Learning Materials at Major Research Universities , 2006 .

[9]  Sanjeev R. Kulkarni.  All Professors Create Equally: Why Faculty Should Have Complete Control Over the Intellectual Proper , 1995 .

[10]  Ip-Shing Fan,et al.  Information security management in e-learning , 2009, 2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST).

[11]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Digital scholarship considered : how new technologies could transform academic work. , 2010 .

[12]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  Bootstrapping a Culture of Sharing to Facilitate Open Educational Resources , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[13]  Andy Powell,et al.  Digital repositories roadmap: looking forward , 2006 .

[14]  Joy Blanchard.  The Teacher Exception Under the Work for Hire Doctrine: Safeguard of Academic Freedom or Vehicle for Academic Free Enterprise? , 2010 .

[15]  Ann L. Monotti,et al.  Universities and Intellectual Property: Ownership and Exploitation , 2003 .

[16]  Anne H. Moore.  Open-Source Learning , 2002 .

[17]  Carole Smith,et al.  Trust and confidence: possibilities for social work in 'high modernity' , 2001 .

[18]  Rosemary Talab.  Faculty Distance Courseware Ownership and the “Wal-Mart” Approach to Higher Education , 2007 .

[19]  Carol Simpson,et al.  What’s yours is mine: Copyright applied to web-based learning , 2001 .

[20]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Copyright ownership of teaching materials , 2006 .

[21]  D. Noble.  Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education , 1998 .

[22]  Cynthia Jimes,et al.  Open Educational Resources: Inquiring into Author Reuse Behaviors , 2008, EC-TEL.

[23]  Ulf-Daniel Ehlers,et al.  Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. , 2011 .

[24]  Steven Lonn,et al.  Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[26]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[27]  C. Boyd,et al.  CHENITZ, W.C., AND SWANSON, J. M. (1986). From Practice to Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research in Nursing Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1989 .

[28]  Toru Iiyoshi,et al.  Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge , 2008 .

[29]  David DiRamio,et al.  Distance Education and Digital Intellectual Property Issues , 2004 .

[30]  Gary Rhoades,et al.  The Social Construction of Copyright Ethics and Values , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[31]  Teresa Martín-Blas,et al.  The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[32]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[33]  Panos Balatsoukas,et al.  The effects of discipline on the application of learning object metadata in UK higher education: the case of the Jorum repository , 2011, Inf. Res..

[34]  Beverly L. Bower,et al.  Instructional and work life issues for distance learning faculty , 2004 .

[35]  Sharon E. Dennis,et al.  Sharing Digital Teaching Resources: Breaking Down Barriers by Addressing the Concerns of Faculty Members , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[36]  J. Sydow,et al.  Knowledge, Trust, and Control: Managing Tensions and Contradictions in a Regional Network of Service Firms , 2003 .

[37]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Attitudes to the rights and rewards for author contributions to repositories for teaching and learning , 2007 .

[38]  Stephen Marshall,et al.  Evaluating the Strategic and Leadership Challenges of MOOCs , 2013 .

[39]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Managing and evaluating digital repositories , 2008, Inf. Res..

[40]  David M. Messick,et al.  Trust as a form of shallow morality. , 2001 .

[41]  Shaheen E Lakhan,et al.  Intellectual Property, Copyright, and Fair Use in Education , 2008 .

[42]  S. Richter,et al.  Preparing Faculty for Teaching a MOOC: Recommendations from Research and Experience , 2014 .

[43]  David A. Wiley,et al.  Instructional Technology and Objectification , 2008 .

[44]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  A comparison of academics' attitudes towards the rights protection of their research and teaching materials , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[45]  Stephanie Reese Masson.  Online Highway Robbery: Is Your Intellectual Property Up for Grabs in the Online Classroom? , 2010 .