University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention

This paper is an attempt to quantify key aspects of innovations, 'basicness' and appropriability, and explore the linkages between them. We rely on detailed patent data. particularly on patent citations, thus awarding the proposed measures a very wide coverage. Relying on the prior that universities perform more basic research than corporations, we find that forward-looking measures of 'importance' and 'generality' capture aspects of the basicness of innovations. Similarly, measures of the degree of reliance on scientific sources. and of the closeness to the origins of innovational paths, appear to reflect the basicness of research. As measures of appropriability we use the fraction of citations coming from patents awarded to the sarne inventor, and in fact these measures are much higher for corporations than fbr universities. An examination of a small number of patents that are universally recognized as 'basic' provides further support for these measures. We find also evidence of the existence of 'technologl trajectories'.

[1]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Simon Kuznets,et al.  Inventive Activity: Problems of Definition and Measurement , 1962 .

[3]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[4]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Inventing the Future , 1963 .

[5]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[6]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[7]  Francis Narin,et al.  Citation rates to technologically important patents , 1981 .

[8]  Z. Griliches Market Value, R&D, and Patents , 1981 .

[9]  Francis Narin,et al.  Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence , 1983 .

[10]  John R. Harris,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[11]  B. Bernanke,et al.  Employment, Hours, and Earnings in the Depression: an Analysis of Eightmanufacturing Industries , 1985 .

[12]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[13]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Markets Valuation of R&D and Patents , 1987 .

[14]  Kuo chia kʿo hsüeh wei yüan hui Science and technology data book , 1987 .

[15]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[16]  A. F. J. van Raan,et al.  Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology , 1988 .

[17]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[18]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners , 1990 .

[19]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[20]  How High are the Giants' Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth , 1993 .

[21]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.