Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study

Abstract Objective: To describe the obstacles encountered when attempting to answer doctors' questions with evidence. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: General practices in Iowa. Participants: 9 academic generalist doctors, 14 family doctors, and 2 medical librarians. Main outcome measure: A taxonomy of obstacles encountered while searching for evidence based answers to doctors' questions. Results: 59 obstacles were encountered and organised according to the five steps in asking and answering questions: recognise a gap in knowledge, formulate a question, search for relevant information, formulate an answer, and use the answer to direct patient care. Six obstacles were considered particularly salient by the investigators and practising doctors: the excessive time required to find information; difficulty modifying the original question, which was often vague and open to interpretation; difficulty selecting an optimal strategy to search for information; failure of a seemingly appropriate resource to cover the topic; uncertainty about how to know when all the relevant evidence has been found so that the search can stop; and inadequate synthesis of multiple bits of evidence into a clinically useful statement. Conclusions: Many obstacles are encountered when asking and answering questions about how to care for patients. Addressing these obstacles could lead to better patient care by improving clinically oriented information resources. What is already known on this topic Doctors are encouraged to search for evidence based answers to their questions about patient care but most go unanswered Studies have not defined the obstacles to answering questions in a systematic manner A comprehensive description of such obstacles has not been presented What this study adds Fifty nine obstacles were found while attempting to answer clinical questions with evidence; six were particularly salient The obstacles were comprehensively described and organised

[1]  K. Sweeney,et al.  Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  K Fozi,et al.  A study of clinical questions in primary care. , 2000, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[3]  P. Gorman,et al.  A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  P. Kahrilas,et al.  Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  V Florance,et al.  The Informationist: A New Health Profession? , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  G. Bergus,et al.  Does the structure of clinical questions affect the outcome of curbside consultations with specialty colleagues? , 2000, Archives of family medicine.

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Practitioners of evidence based care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  M. Ebell,et al.  Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care , 1999, BMJ.

[9]  M. Ebell,et al.  Information at the Point of Care: Answering Clinical Questions , 1999, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[10]  E C Armstrong,et al.  The well-built clinical question: the key to finding the best evidence efficiently. , 1999, WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin.

[11]  W R Hersh,et al.  Applicability and quality of information for answering clinical questions on the Web. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Problems in the "evidence" of "evidence-based medicine". , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  G. Davison,et al.  Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  S. Satya‐Murti.  Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 1997 .

[15]  M. Chambliss,et al.  Answering clinical questions. , 1996, The Journal of family practice.

[16]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Information needs of physicians , 1995 .

[17]  M. Lorentzon.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[18]  A. Berstad,et al.  Lansoprazole versus omeprazole in short-term treatment of reflux oesophagitis. Results of a Scandinavian multicentre trial. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[19]  R A Bankowitz,et al.  Physicians' use of computer software in answering clinical questions. , 1993, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[20]  A. Ippoliti,et al.  Two doses of omeprazole versus placebo in symptomatic erosive esophagitis: the U.S. Multicenter Study. , 1992, Gastroenterology.

[21]  B. Buchanan,et al.  Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[22]  Cooper,et al.  Use of the critical incident technique to evaluate the impact of MEDLINE , 1989 .

[23]  J W Williamson,et al.  Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[24]  D. Covell,et al.  Information needs in office practice: are they being met? , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[25]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .