Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet.

Variations in foot posture are associated with the development of some lower limb injuries. However, the mechanisms underlying this relationship are unclear. The objective of this study was to compare foot kinematics between normal, pes cavus and pes planus foot posture groups using a multi-segment foot model. Ninety-seven healthy adults, aged 18-47 were classified as either normal (n=37), pes cavus (n=30) or pes planus (n=30) based on normative data for the Foot Posture Index, Arch Index and normalised navicular height. A five segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux during barefoot walking at a self-selected speed. Angle at heel contact, peak angle, time to peak angle and range of motion was measured for each segment. One way ANOVAs with post-hoc analyses of mean differences were used to compare foot posture groups. The pes cavus group demonstrated a distinctive pattern of motion compared to the normal and pes planus foot posture groups. Effect sizes of significant mean differences were large and comparable to similar studies. Three key differences in overall foot function were observed between the groups: (i) altered frontal and transverse plane angles of the rearfoot in the pes cavus foot; (ii) Less midfoot motion in the pes cavus foot during initial contact and midstance; and (iii) reduced midfoot frontal plane ROM in the pes planus foot during pre-swing. These findings indicate that foot posture does influence motion of the foot.

[1]  H. Elftman The transverse tarsal joint and its control. , 1960, Clinical orthopaedics.

[2]  H. Menz,et al.  A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[3]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements , 2009, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[5]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  E. Fuller,et al.  The windlass mechanism of the foot. A mechanical model to explain pathology. , 2000, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[7]  P Lundgren,et al.  Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[8]  B. Yates,et al.  The Incidence and Risk Factors in the Development of Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome among Naval Recruits , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  C. Nester,et al.  Error in the description of foot kinematics due to violation of rigid body assumptions. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  F. Bojsen-Møller,et al.  Calcaneocuboid joint and stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot at high and low gear push off. , 1979, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high- and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks. , 2011, Human movement science.

[12]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches , 2001 .

[13]  B. Jones,et al.  Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. , 1993, Archives of family medicine.

[14]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[15]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Jonathan T Deland,et al.  Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[17]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Normative values for the Foot Posture Index , 2008, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[19]  J. Houck,et al.  Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking. , 2008, Gait & Posture.

[20]  C. Nester,et al.  Foot kinematics in patients with two patterns of pathological plantar hyperkeratosis , 2011, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[21]  Joshua Burns,et al.  Foot type and overuse injury in triathletes. , 2005, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[22]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait , 2009, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[23]  Jack Crosbie,et al.  The effect of pes cavus on foot pain and plantar pressure. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  B. Nigg,et al.  Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Hylton B. Menz,et al.  Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature , 1995 .

[26]  Mohammad R Fotoohabadi,et al.  Foot posture in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis , 2010, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[27]  Y. T. Wang,et al.  The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[28]  T G McPoil,et al.  Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[29]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Association between foot type and tibial stress injuries: a systematic review , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[30]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Extrinsic Muscle Activity, Foot Motion and Ankle Joint Moments During the Stance Phase of Walking , 2001, Foot & ankle international.