Biofuels and the need for additional carbon

Use of biofuels does not reduce emissions from energy combustion but may offset emissions by increasing plant growth or by reducing plant residue or other non-energy emissions. To do so, biofuel production must generate and use 'additional carbon', which means carbon that plants would not otherwise absorb or that would be emitted to the atmosphere anyway. When biofuels cause no direct land use change, they use crops that would grow regardless of biofuels so they do not directly absorb additional carbon. All potential greenhouse gas reductions from such biofuels, as well as many potential emission increases, result from indirect effects, including reduced crop consumption, price-induced yield gains and land conversion. If lifecycle analyses ignore indirect effects of biofuels, they therefore cannot properly find greenhouse gas reductions. Uncertainties in estimating indirect emission reductions and increases are largely symmetrical. The failure to distinguish 'additional' carbon from carbon already absorbed or withheld from the atmosphere also leads to large overestimates of global bioenergy potential. Reasonable confidence in greenhouse gas reductions requires a precautionary approach to estimating indirect effects that does not rely on any single model. Reductions can be more directly assured, and other adverse indirect effects avoided, by focusing on biofuels from directly additional carbon.

[1]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[2]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Crop Residues: Agriculture's Largest Harvest , 1999 .

[3]  H. Haberl,et al.  Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[5]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Shift in the marginal supply of vegetable oil , 2008 .

[6]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error , 2009, Science.

[7]  A. Faaij,et al.  Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios , 2005 .

[8]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[9]  S. Page,et al.  The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997 , 2002, Nature.

[10]  Tracey Holloway,et al.  Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology , 2008 .

[11]  Timothy D. Searchinger,et al.  Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Soy-based US Biodiesel when Factoring in Emissions from Land Use Change , 2008 .

[12]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[13]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[14]  Marc Londo,et al.  Bioenergy: a sustainable and reliable energy source. A review of status and prospects. , 2009 .

[15]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? , 2008 .

[16]  Christopher J. Kucharik,et al.  Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's Long Shadow , 2006 .

[18]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[19]  Navin Ramankutty,et al.  Our share of the planetary pie , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  More Productive Than Maize in the Midwest: How Does Miscanthus Do It?1[W][OA] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[21]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  The Huffington Post , 2010 .

[22]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[23]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Forests, carbon and global climate , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Doug Allen,et al.  Driving on Biomass , 2009, Science.