Awareness Affects the Response of Human Subjects Exposed to a Single Whiplash-Like Perturbation

Study Design. Human subjects were exposed experimentally to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Objective. To determine how awareness of the presence and timing of a whiplash-like perturbation affects the onset and amplitude of the neck muscle response and the peak magnitude of head and neck kinematics. Summary of Background Data. Although most whiplash injuries are sustained in rear-end collisions, which occur without warning, most studies of whiplash injury have used subjects aware of the imminent perturbation. Methods. Seated subjects (35 women and 31 men) underwent a single forward horizontal perturbation (peak acceleration, 1.5 g). Surface electromyography measured the sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscle activity. Three awareness conditions were tested: a countdown for subjects alerted to their perturbation, a perturbation without an alert for subjects who expected it within 60 seconds, and an unexpected perturbation for surprised subjects who were deceived. Results. The muscle and kinematic responses of aware (alerted and unalerted) subjects were not significantly different. Sternocleidomastoid activation occurred 7 ms later in surprised subjects than in aware subjects (P < 0.0002). Cervical paraspinal amplitudes were 260% larger and angular head accelerations in flexion were 180% larger in surprised male subjects than in alerted male subjects. Surprised female subjects exhibited a 25% larger head retraction and a 30% lower forward acceleration of the mastoid process than aware female subjects. Conclusions. The larger retractions observed in surprised females likely produce larger tissue strains and may increase injury potential. Aware human subjects may not replicate the muscle response, kinematic response, or whiplash injury potential of unprepared occupants in real collisions.

[1]  R. P. Howard,et al.  Human head and neck kinematics after low velocity rear-end impacts-understanding "whiplash" , 1995 .

[2]  W. Rutherford,et al.  Neck sprain--a major cause of disability following car accidents. , 1987, Injury.

[3]  Robert D. Anderson,et al.  Human Occupant Kinematic Response to Low Speed Rear-End Impacts , 1994 .

[4]  Terry A. Smith,et al.  Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low-speed rear-end collisions , 1997 .

[5]  L. Silverstein,et al.  Selective attention effects on the reflex blink. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[6]  M. Sturzenegger,et al.  Presenting symptoms and signs after whiplash injury , 1994, Neurology.

[7]  van den Aj Kroonenberg,et al.  HUMAN HEAD-NECK RESPONSE DURING LOW-SPEED REAR END IMPACTS , 1998 .

[8]  J. Balla,et al.  The late whiplash syndrome. , 1980, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[9]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A. B. Kelley,et al.  Automobile head restraints--frequency of neck injury claims in relation to the presence of head restraints. , 1972, American journal of public health.

[11]  D. Sanderson,et al.  The effect of perturbation acceleration and advance warning on the neck postural responses of seated subjects , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  A. Marsden,et al.  The effect of head restraints and seat belts on the incidence of neck injury in car accidents. , 1986, Injury.

[13]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  RISK AND MECHANISMS OF INJURIES TO THE CERVICAL SPINE IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS , 1985 .

[14]  H. Steffan,et al.  THE MOVEMENT OF HEAD AND CERVICAL SPINE DURING REAREND IMPACT , 1994 .

[15]  L Jakobsson,et al.  WHIPS--Volvo's Whiplash Protection Study. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  C. Brunia,et al.  Waiting in readiness: gating in attention and motor preparation. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[17]  R. Newman,et al.  Soft tissue cervical spinal injuries in motor vehicle accidents. , 1989, Injury.

[18]  S. Kumar,et al.  Role of awareness in head-neck acceleration in low velocity rear-end impacts. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  K Ono,et al.  Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Per Lövsund,et al.  NECK INJURIES IN REAR END COLLISIONS AMONG FRONT AND REAR SEAT OCCUPANTS , 1988 .

[21]  Eugene Bahniuk,et al.  A discrete parameter model of the head and neck with neuromuscular feedback , 1979 .

[22]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  The relative power of parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. , 1993 .

[23]  M. Sturzenegger,et al.  The effect of accident mechanisms and initial findings on the long-term course of whiplash injury , 1995, Journal of Neurology.

[24]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. , 1999, Spine.

[25]  J. Frank Spinal motor preparation in humans. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  R. P. Howard,et al.  Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts , 1993 .

[27]  C J Kahane AN EVALUATION OF HEAD RESTRAINTS. FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD 202 , 1982 .

[28]  Johan Davidsson,et al.  Human Volunteer Kinematics in Rear-End Sled Collisions , 2001 .

[29]  David J. Groggel,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 2000, Technometrics.

[30]  J. H. Mathewson,et al.  Controlled automobile rearend collisions, an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. , 1955, Canadian services medical journal.

[31]  A. Lie,et al.  Soft tissue injury of the cervical spine in rear-end and frontal car collisions , 1995 .

[32]  S. Meyer,et al.  Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts? , 1997, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[33]  Martin B. Davis,et al.  Mechanical Evidence of Cervical Facet Capsule Injury During Whiplash: A Cadaveric Study Using Combined Shear, Compression, and Extension Loading , 2001, Spine.

[34]  J. B. Wheeler,et al.  Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[36]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Cervical range of motion and dynamic response and strength of cervical muscles , 1973 .

[37]  A. Wittek,et al.  Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head-neck-torso kinematics during low speed rear impacts , 1997 .

[38]  Å. Nygren,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Headrests in Rear-End Collisions , 1985 .

[39]  T. Szabo,et al.  Human Subject Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity During Low Speed Rear Impacts , 1996 .