Estimating Constituency Preferences from Sparse Survey Data Using Auxiliary Geographic Information

Measures of constituency preferences are of vital importance for the study of political representation and other research areas. Yet, such measures are often difficult to obtain. Previous survey-based estimates frequently lack precision and coverage due to small samples, rely on questionable assumptions or require detailed auxiliary information about the constituencies’ population characteristics. We propose an alternative Bayesian hierarchical approach that exploits minimal geographic information readily available from digitalized constituency maps. If at hand, social background data are easily integrated. To validate the method, we use national polls and district-level results from the 2009 German Bundestag election, an empirical case for which detailed structural information is missing. 1 Intr oduction

[1]  Charles F. Cnudde,et al.  The Linkage between Constituency Attitudes and Congressional Voting Behavior: A Causal Model , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[2]  D. Seidman.  SIMULATION OF PUBLIC OPINION: A CAVEAT , 1975 .

[3]  Walter J. Stone,et al.  The Structure of Constituency Representation: On Theory and Method , 1986, The Journal of Politics.

[4]  Rodney E. Hero.  Faces of inequality : social diversity in American politics , 1998 .

[5]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[6]  J. Snyder.  "Constituency Preferences: California ballot Propositions, 1974-1990" , 1996 .

[7]  R. Johnston,et al.  Putting Voters in Their Place , 2006 .

[8]  Jeffrey R. Lax,et al.  How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States , 2009 .

[9]  Jonathan P. Kastellec,et al.  Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees , 2010 .

[10]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do , 2008 .

[11]  Jake Bowers,et al.  Designing multi-level studies: sampling voters and electoral contexts , 2002 .

[12]  John Heppen.  Racial and Social Diversity and U.S. Presidential Election Regions , 2003, The Professional Geographer.

[13]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[14]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Policy representation of constituency interests , 1980 .

[15]  E. Mcdonagh.  Constituency Influence on House Roll-Call Votes in the Progressive Era, 1913-1915 , 1993 .

[16]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[17]  A. Hintze,et al.  Measuring Representation , 2010 .

[18]  S. Finkel,et al.  The Aggregate Impact of Explanatory Variables in Logit and Linear Probability Models , 1992 .

[19]  John L. Sullivan,et al.  Ideological Distance between Candidates: An Empirical Examination* , 1976 .

[20]  Elisabeth R. Gerber,et al.  Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Samuel L. Popkin,et al.  Candidates, issues, and strategies , 1964 .

[22]  J. Kuklinski,et al.  The Delegate Theory of Representation , 1979 .

[23]  Monica Pratesi,et al.  Small area estimation: the EBLUP estimator based on spatially correlated random area effects , 2008, Stat. Methods Appl..

[24]  Joshua D. Clinton.  Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House , 2006 .

[25]  J. Kuklinski.  Representativeness and Elections: A Policy Analysis , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[26]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal , 2010, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[27]  David Martin Luebke,et al.  Locating the victim: An overview of census-taking, tabulation technology and persecution in Nazi Germany , 1994, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[28]  Keith. Krehbiel.  Constituency characteristics and legislative preferences , 1993 .

[29]  C. Gay.  Legislating Without Constraints: The Effect of Minority Districting on Legislators' Responsiveness to Constituency Preferences , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[30]  Jonathan Rodden.  The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences , 2010 .

[31]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling , 2007, 0710.5005.

[32]  Christopher H. Achen.  Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient , 1977 .

[33]  A. Agresti,et al.  Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions , 1998 .

[34]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  BAYES AND EMPIRICAL BAYES METHODS FOR DATA ANALYSIS , 1996, Stat. Comput..

[35]  Jeffrey R. Lax,et al.  Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[36]  D. Pfeffermann.  Small Area Estimation‐New Developments and Directions , 2002 .

[37]  Michael C. Herron,et al.  Economic Crisis, Iraq, and Race: A Study of the 2008 Presidential Election , 2010 .

[38]  J. Agnew.  Making Political Geography , 2002 .

[39]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[40]  D. King,et al.  Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[41]  Mark A. Zupan,et al.  Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics , 1984 .

[42]  Philip Ethington,et al.  Political Places and Institutional Spaces: The Intersection of Political Science and Political Geography , 2007 .

[43]  Gary King,et al.  A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[44]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data , 1978 .

[45]  Georgia Kernell.  Giving Order to Districts: Estimating Voter Distributions with National Election Returns , 2009, Political Analysis.

[46]  S. Openshaw.  A million or so correlation coefficients : three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem , 1979 .

[47]  John E. Jackson.  An Errors-in-Variables Approach to Estimating Models with Small Area Data , 1989, Political Analysis.

[48]  Robert S. Erikson.  Measuring Constituency Opinion: The 1978 U. S. Congressional Election Survey , 1981 .

[49]  Robert J. Franzese,et al.  Empirical Models of Spatial Interdependence , 2008 .

[50]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[51]  Peter Selb,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Study of New Parties’ Entry and Electoral Success , 2010 .

[52]  L. A. Goodman.  Ecological Regressions and Behavior of Individuals , 1953 .

[53]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections , 2001 .

[54]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[55]  J. Gibson.  The Political Consequences of Intolerance: Cultural Conformity and Political Freedom , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[56]  Warren E. Miller,et al.  Constituency Influence in Congress , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[57]  Volker Hüfken.  Supplementary questionnaire and nonresponse-results from the German ISSP survey , 2010 .

[58]  Ithiel de Sola Pool,et al.  THE SIMULMATICS PROJECT , 1961 .

[59]  Ronald E. Weber,et al.  COMPUTER SIMULATION OF STATE ELECTORATES , 1972 .

[60]  John O. Brehm.  The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation , 1993 .

[61]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls , 2004, Political Analysis.

[62]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Measuring District-Level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. Elections* , 2008, Journal of Politics.

[63]  C. Manski,et al.  Cross‐Level/Ecological Inference , 2008 .

[64]  James C. Garand,et al.  Measuring Constituency Ideology in U.S. House Districts: A Top-Down Simulation Approach , 2003 .

[65]  E. Plutzer,et al.  Ten Thousand Democracies: Politics and Public Opinion in America's School Districts , 2005 .

[66]  Joseph Bafumi,et al.  Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[67]  D. Brady,et al.  Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[68]  G. Powell.  The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules , 2009 .

[69]  Danny Pfeffermann,et al.  Small Area Estimation , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[70]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senate Ideology , 1996 .

[71]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[72]  William F. Christensen,et al.  Predicting Presidential and Other Multistage Election Outcomes Using State-Level Pre-Election Polls , 2008 .

[73]  M. Neiman,et al.  Representation and Local Policy , 2009 .

[74]  Thomas Saalfeld.  Germany: Stability and Strategy in a Mixed-Member Proportional System , 2005 .

[75]  Martin Johnson,et al.  Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data , 2002 .

[76]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States , 1994 .