Targeting cogeneration and waste utilization through process integration

In this paper we focus on energy flows and specifically on the complex interactions between heat and power generation and use in steam systems along with combustible wastes of the process. Our objective is to present a systematic methodology for the quick targeting of power cogeneration potential in steam systems ahead of designing the power generation network. The devised approach makes effective utilization of combustible wastes and reconciles the use and dispatch of process fuel sources, heating and non-heating uses of steam, and power generation. The new concept of extractable energy is introduced to facilitate a simple calculation of cogeneration potential in the process. Balances around steam headers are used to identify surpluses and deficits. Next, surplus and deficit composite curves are constructed to identify feasible transfers of extractable energy. The result is the identification of the cogeneration target and excess steam that can be used in condensing turbines. This methodology takes a holistic view of the process and can easily be combined with other mass and energy integration techniques. It specifically accommodates both (a) production objectives (mass integration) and (b) heat recovery network targeting and utility selection (energy integration). An example problem is presented to illustrate the methodology.

[1]  Russell F. Dunn,et al.  Process integration design methods for water conservation and wastewater reduction in industry , 2001 .

[2]  Antonis C. Kokossis,et al.  Conceptual optimisation of utility networks for operational variations—I. targets and level optimisation , 1998 .

[3]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Solve design puzzles with mass integration , 1998 .

[4]  M. El‐Halwagi Pollution prevention through process integration : systematic design tools , 1997 .

[5]  Robin Smith,et al.  Modelling and Optimization of Utility Systems , 2004 .

[6]  M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Optimize heat transfer networks : An innovative method applies heat integration to cost-effectively retrofit bottlenecks in utility systems , 2008 .

[7]  Bodo Linnhoff,et al.  A User guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy , 1994 .

[8]  Russell F. Dunn,et al.  Process integration design methods for water conservation and wastewater reduction in industry: Part 2: Design for multiple contaminants , 2001 .

[9]  B Linnhoff,et al.  PINCH ANALYSIS- A STATE OF THE RRT REVIEW , 1993 .

[10]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Process integration technology review: background and applications in the chemical process industry , 2003 .

[11]  Ya Wen,et al.  Environmental and economic assessments of heat exchanger networks for optimum minimum approach temperature , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Bodo Linnhoff,et al.  Total site targets for fuel, co-generation, emissions, and cooling , 1993 .

[13]  Luis Puigjaner,et al.  Targeting and design methodology for reduction of fuel, power and CO2 on total sites , 1997 .

[14]  Kazuo Matsuda,et al.  Applying heat integration total site based pinch technology to a large industrial area in Japan to further improve performance of highly efficient process plants , 2009 .

[15]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  RIGOROUS GRAPHICAL TARGETING FOR RESOURCE CONSERVATION VIA MATERIAL RECYCLE/REUSE NETWORKS , 2003 .