Properties of a monopivot centrifugal blood pump manufactured by 3D printing

An impeller the same geometry as the impeller of a commercial monopivot cardiopulmonary bypass pump was manufactured using 3D printing. The 3D-printed impeller was integrated into the pump casing of the commercially available pump to form a 3D-printed pump model. The surface roughness of the impeller, the hydraulic performance, the axial displacement of the rotating impeller, and the hemolytic properties of the 3D-printed model were measured and compared with those of the commercially available model. Although the surface roughness of the 3D-printed model was significantly larger than that of the commercially available model, the hydraulic performance of the two models almost coincided. The hemolysis level of the 3D-printed model roughly coincided with that of the commercially available model under low-pressure head conditions, but increased greatly under high-pressure head conditions, as a result of the narrow gap between the rotating impeller and the pump casing. The gap became narrow under high-pressure head conditions, because the axial thrust applied to the impeller increased with increasing impeller rotational speed. Moreover, the axial displacement of the rotating impeller was twice that of the commercially available model, confirming that the elastic deformation of the 3D-printed impeller was larger than that of the commercially available impeller. These results suggest that trial models manufactured by 3D printing can reproduce the hydraulic performance of the commercial product. However, both the surface roughness and the deformation of the trial models must be considered to precisely evaluate the hemolytic properties of the model.

[1]  W K Chan,et al.  Rapid manufacturing techniques in the development of an axial blood pump impeller , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Hemocompatibility evaluation with experimental and computational fluid dynamic analyses for a monopivot circulatory assist pump. , 2009, Artificial organs.

[3]  Ryo Kosaka,et al.  Effect of Impeller Geometry on Lift-Off Characteristics and Rotational Attitude in a Monopivot Centrifugal Blood Pump. , 2016, Artificial organs.

[4]  Yukihiko Nosé,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on hemolysis in a centrifugal blood pump. , 1996 .

[5]  Y Nosé,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on hemolysis in a centrifugal blood pump. , 1996, ASAIO journal.

[6]  Eric M. Kennedy,et al.  Friction factors for pipe flow of xanthan-based concentrates of fire fighting foams , 2005 .

[7]  Christopher M. Haggerty,et al.  Numerical, Hydraulic, and Hemolytic Evaluation of an Intravascular Axial Flow Blood Pump to Mechanically Support Fontan Patients , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Shaun D Gregory,et al.  Manuscript for submission to : Artificial Organs Title : ANATOMIC FITTING OF TOTAL ARTIFICIAL HEARTS FOR IN-VIVO EVALUATION , 2017 .

[9]  Toru Masuzawa,et al.  Hemolysis resulting from surface roughness under shear flow conditions using a rotational shear stressor. , 2006, Artificial organs.

[10]  Y Nosé,et al.  The need for standardizing the index of hemolysis. , 1994, Artificial organs.

[11]  Alexander Medvedev,et al.  Rotodynamic Pump Development , 2000 .

[12]  Mitsuo Umezu,et al.  Effects of Surface Roughness on Mechanical Hemolysis. , 1996, Artificial organs.

[13]  Juliana Leme,et al.  Centrifugal blood pump for temporary ventricular assist devices with low priming and ceramic bearings. , 2013, Artificial organs.

[14]  D. Rajenthirakumar,et al.  Analysis of interaction between geometry and efficiency of impeller pump using rapid prototyping , 2009 .

[15]  K. Litwak,et al.  HeartMate III: Pump Design for a Centrifugal LVAD with a Magnetically Levitated Rotor , 2001, ASAIO journal.

[16]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Enhancement of hemocompatibility of the MERA monopivot centrifugal pump: toward medium-term use. , 2013, Artificial organs.