Nominal Flight Time Optimization for Minimum Delay and Fuel Consumption of Arrival Traffic

Nominal flight time optimization to simultaneously minimize both delay and fuel consumption of arrival traffic is discussed. In the arrival traffic interval management, the estimated time of arrival is refered to determine the arrival time of aircraft at a specific position, e.g. runway threshld, merging point. The arrival time is generally estimated by aircraft position and their nominal flight time to reach the position. In this case, the intervalcontrolled traffic behavior is also considered subject to the nominal flight time. In a fourdimensional trajectory operation, it is considered possible to reduce the time interval from the preceding aircraft to the minimum one without degrading the safety. Through arrival traffic control simulations using a flight trajectory that aircraft equipped with common fight management systems are able to fly along, it is clarified that a control strategy using the flight time reduction is able to achieve a delay free traffic with the near-minimum fuel consumption. It is also clarified possible to achieve such delay free traffic by applying the longer nominal flight time even when subject to the larger initial time error. In addition, the average flight time becomes shorter than that controlled by a conventional traffic control that only delays the following aircraft with a shorter nominal flight time. It is clarified possible to estimate the delay mean and standard deviation from the statistics of the traffic arriving at the top of descent. This mathematical estimation enables the determinations of the optimum nominal flight time to simultaneously minimize the delay and the fuel consumption.

[1]  Gaurav Nagle,et al.  Optimized Profile Descent Arrivals at Los Angeles International Airport , 2013 .

[2]  Noboru Takeichi,et al.  Arrival Time Control during Continuous Descent and Its Application to Air Traffic Control , 2013 .

[3]  Noburu Takeichi,et al.  Arrival-Time Controllability of Tailored Arrival Subjected to Flight-Path Constraints , 2010 .

[4]  John Kaneshige,et al.  Flight-Deck Strategies and Outcomes When Flying Schedule-Matching Descents , 2013 .

[5]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  DESIGN OF AUTOMATED SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT OF ARRIVAL TRAFFIC , 1989 .

[6]  Hanbong Lee,et al.  Fuel cost, delay and throughput tradeoffs in runway scheduling , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[7]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Automated Conflict Resolution, Arrival Management and Weather Avoidance for ATM , 2010 .

[8]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Analysis of delay reducing and fuel saving sequencing and spacing algorithms for arrival traffic , 1991 .

[9]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Controller Support Tools for Schedule-Based Terminal-Area Operations , 2011 .

[10]  Joel Lachter,et al.  Management of continuous descent approach during interval management operation , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[11]  Yoshikazu Miyazawa,et al.  Dynamic programming application to airliner four dimensional optimal flight trajectory , 2013 .

[12]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Continuous Descent Approach: Design and Flight Test for Louisville International Airport , 2004 .

[13]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Simulation Results for Airborne Precision Spacing along Continuous Descent Arrivals , 2008 .

[14]  Heinz Erzberger Design principles and algorithms for automated air traffic management , 1995 .