Attachment Style and Verbal Descriptions of Romantic Partners

The present study investigated attachment style differences in subjects' reports of their romantic partners. The sample consisted of seventy-four undergraduates (thirty-seven males and thirty-seven females) who had been in a dating relationship for at least 1 month. Subjects supplied a verbal description of their current dating partner and later completed the single-item measure of attachment style developed by Hazan & Shaver (1987). The verbal reports were tape-recorded and transcribed. The transcripts were coded for spontaneous references to attachment related issues, and content scales were also developed to tap idealization, a number of aspects of relationship quality and attitudes towards the partner's social network (family and friends). The content of subjects' references to attachment-related issues was strongly related to their self-reported attachment style and was consistent with the essential characteristics of the three styles. The content scales revealed attachment style effects for scales measuring idealization, relationship quality and attitudes to partner's social network. Secure subjects showed intermediate levels of idealization and relatively favourable attitudes to the partner's family and made more references to positive relationship characteristics. The pattern of scores of avoidant subjects indicated a generally low level of emotional intensity, while the anxious/ ambivalent group obtained high scores on idealization. The results support questionnaire studies of attachment, in showing the importance of attachment-related issues to the experience of romantic love.

[1]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Judith A. Feeney,et al.  Attachment Style as a Predictor of Adult Romantic Relationships , 1990 .

[4]  Cindy Hazan,et al.  A Biased Overview of the Study of Love , 1988 .

[5]  J. Bartko,et al.  On Various Intraclass Correlation Reliability Coefficients , 1976 .

[6]  G. Spanier.  Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .

[7]  Jude Cassidy,et al.  Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. , 1985 .

[8]  K. Davis,et al.  Lovestyles and Attachment Styles Compared: Their Relations to Each Other and to Various Relationship Characteristics , 1988 .

[9]  M. Ainsworth.  Attachments beyond infancy. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[10]  Steven C. Predmore,et al.  Intimates as agents of social support: sources of consolation or despair? , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  M. Westbrook,et al.  Scales measuring people's perception of themselves as origins and pawns. , 1980, Journal of personality assessment.

[12]  J. Uebersax,et al.  Client correlates of community informant adjustment ratings. , 1980, Journal of personality assessment.

[13]  M. Lorenz.  Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales , 1971 .

[14]  F. Lolas.  Behavioral Text and Psychological Context: On Pragmatic Verbal Behavior Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  COMMUNICATION AND UNDERSTANDING IN MARRIAGE , 1984 .

[16]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Using Categorical Variables in Discriminant Analysis. , 1986, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Research on love: Does it measure up? , 1989 .

[18]  M. Pistole,et al.  Attachment in Adult Romantic Relationships: Style of Conflict Resolution and Relationship Satisfaction , 1989 .

[19]  B. Weiner,et al.  Spontaneous" causal thinking. , 1985 .

[20]  Deborah Ruth Richardson,et al.  Perceptions of Risk in Intimacy , 1988 .

[21]  M. Ainsworth,et al.  Infant crying and maternal responsiveness. , 1972, Child development.

[22]  S. Metts,et al.  Development of the `Romantic Beliefs Scale' and Examination of the Effects of Gender and Gender-Role Orientation , 1989 .

[23]  K. Bartholomew.  Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective , 1990 .

[24]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. , 1987 .