“I Choose Assistive Devices That Save My Face”: A Study on Perceptions of Accessibility and Assistive Technology Use Conducted in China

Despite the potential benefits of assistive technologies (ATs) for people with various disabilities, only around 7% of Chinese with disabilities have had an opportunity to use ATs. Even for those who have used ATs, the abandonment rate was high. Although China has the world’s largest population with disabilities, prior research exploring how ATs are used and perceived, and why ATs are abandoned have been conducted primarily in North America and Europe. In this paper, we present an interview study conducted in China with 26 people with various disabilities to understand their practices, challenges, perceptions, and misperceptions of using ATs. From the study, we learned about factors that influence AT adoption practices (e.g., misuse of accessible infrastructure, issues with replicating existing commercial ATs), challenges using ATs in social interactions (e.g., Chinese stigma), and misperceptions about ATs (e.g., ATs should overcome inaccessible social infrastructures). Informed by the findings, we derive a set of design considerations to bridge the existing gaps in AT design (e.g., manual vs. electronic ATs) and to improve ATs’ social acceptability in China.

[1]  K. Hwang,et al.  Moral face and social face: Contingent self‐esteem in Confucian society , 2006 .

[2]  Khai N. Truong,et al.  FMT: A Wearable Camera-Based Object Tracking Memory Aid for Older Adults , 2019, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[3]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques , 2008, Assets '08.

[4]  Arne H. Eide,et al.  Assistive Technology in Low-Income Countries , 2009 .

[5]  H. Kaye,et al.  Disparities in Usage of Assistive Technology Among People With Disabilities , 2008, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[6]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  You Watch, You Give, and You Engage: A Study of Live Streaming Practices in China , 2018, CHI.

[7]  Sara Raquel Martins Barili,et al.  On the non-disabled perceptions of four common mobility devices in Norway: A comparative study based on semantic differentials , 2019, Technology and Disability.

[8]  Jacquie Ripat,et al.  The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  Leah Findlater,et al.  Accessibility in context: understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments , 2014, ASSETS.

[10]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology , 2011, ASSETS.

[11]  P. Olivier,et al.  Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia , 2012, CHI.

[12]  Katherine Deibel,et al.  A convenient heuristic model for understanding assistive technology adoption , 2013, ASSETS.

[13]  B. J. Myers,et al.  Cultural Influences on Perceptions of Health, Illness, and Disability: A Review and Focus on Autism , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[15]  William Armstrong,et al.  Evaluation of CIR-Whirlwind Wheelchair and service provision in Afghanistan , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  Erin Brady,et al.  Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design , 2018, ASSETS.

[17]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[18]  R. Harland,et al.  Cultural influences on perception of disability and disabled people: a comparison of opinions from students in the United Kingdom (UK) Pakistan (PAK) about a generic wheelchair using a semantic differential scale , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[19]  Khai N. Truong,et al.  BrailleSketch: A Gesture-based Text Input Method for People with Visual Impairments , 2017, ASSETS.

[20]  Halley P. Profita,et al.  Designing wearable computing technology for acceptability and accessibility , 2016, ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput..

[21]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities , 2009, Assets '09.

[22]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  The Tangible Desktop: A Multimodal Approach to Nonvisual Computing , 2017, TACC.

[23]  Ying Han,et al.  iWink: Exploring Eyelid Gestures on Mobile Devices , 2020, HUMA @ ACM Multimedia.

[24]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Design, adoption, and assessment of a socio-technical environment supporting independence for persons with cognitive disabilities , 2008, CHI.

[25]  Kyle Montague,et al.  Getting Smartphones to Talkback: Understanding the Smartphone Adoption Process of Blind Users , 2015, ASSETS.

[26]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse , 2015, CHI.

[27]  Shaun K. Kane,et al.  Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces , 2015, CHI.

[28]  Zhen Li,et al.  Eyelid Gestures on Mobile Devices for People with Motor Impairments , 2020, ASSETS.

[29]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinson's , 2014, CHI.

[30]  Marti L. Riemer-Reiss,et al.  Factors Associated with Assistive Technology Discontinuance among Individuals with Disabilities , 2000 .

[31]  Chieko Asakawa,et al.  VizLens: A Robust and Interactive Screen Reader for Interfaces in the Real World , 2016, UIST.

[32]  R. Welsh,et al.  The influence of social context on the perception of assistive technology: using a semantic differential scale to compare young adults’ views from the United Kingdom and Pakistan , 2020, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[33]  Chun-ning Guo The development of the policy of persons with disabilities in China , 2014 .

[34]  Eunjoo Kim,et al.  Comparison of Special Education in the United States, Korea, and China. , 2019 .

[35]  R. Rubin,et al.  Race, disability and assistive devices: sociodemographics or discrimination , 2001 .

[36]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  "I feel it is my responsibility to stream": Streaming and Engaging with Intangible Cultural Heritage through Livestreaming , 2019, CHI.

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[38]  Helena M. Mentis,et al.  "But, I don't take steps": Examining the Inaccessibility of Fitness Trackers for Wheelchair Athletes , 2015, ASSETS.

[39]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology , 2016, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[40]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Agency in Assistive Technology Adoption: Visual Impairment and Smartphone Use in Bangalore , 2017, CHI.

[41]  C. Zhang ‘Nothing about us without us’: the emerging disability movement and advocacy in China , 2017 .

[42]  Gerhard Weber,et al.  A Pilot Study of Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind People Find an Entrance , 2015, MobileHCI.

[43]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Incorporating Social Factors in Accessible Design , 2018, ASSETS.

[44]  Rogerio DePaula,et al.  A Framework for the Adoption of Assistive Technology , 2002 .

[45]  Khai N. Truong,et al.  Face Recognition Assistant for People with Visual Impairments , 2019, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[46]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[47]  Halley Profita,et al.  The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use , 2016, CHI.

[48]  Rex Hartson,et al.  The UX book, process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience by Rex Hartson and Pardha S. Pyla , 2012, SOEN.

[49]  Rob Miller,et al.  VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions , 2010, UIST.

[50]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  The challenges in adopting assistive technologies in the workplace for people with visual impairments , 2018, OZCHI.

[51]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions , 2011, CHI.

[52]  Josh D. Tenenberg,et al.  A blind person's interactions with technology , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[53]  M J Scherer,et al.  Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[54]  Amy Hurst,et al.  ABC and 3D: opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments , 2014, ASSETS.

[55]  T May-Teerink,et al.  A survey of rehabilitative services and people coping with physical disabilities in Uganda, East Africa. , 1999, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[56]  Jeffrey P. Bigham,et al.  Tracking @stemxcomet: teaching programming to blind students via 3D printing, crisis management, and twitter , 2014, SIGCSE.