Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game

We experimentally investigate a repeated "inspection game" where, in the stage game, an employee can either work or shirk and an employer simultaneously chooses to inspect or not inspect. The unique equilibrium of the stage game is in mixed strategies with positive probabilities of shirking/inspecting while combined payoffs are maximized when the employee works and the employer does not inspect. We examine the effects of allowing the employer discretion to sanction or reward the employee after observing stage game payoffs. When employers have limited discretion, and can only apply sanctions and/or rewards following an inspection, we find that both instruments are equally effective in reducing shirking and increasing joint earnings. When employers have discretion to reward and/or sanction independently of whether they inspect we find that rewards are more effective than sanctions. In treatments where employers can combine sanctions and rewards employers rely mainly on rewards and outcomes closely resemble those of treatments where only rewards are possible.

[1]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[2]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas , 2014 .

[3]  An investment game with third-party intervention , 2008 .

[4]  A. Schotter,et al.  Network architecture, cooperation and punishment in public good experiments , 2012 .

[5]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: The case of social loafing , 1995 .

[6]  Robert Shupp,et al.  The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods , 2006 .

[7]  B. Rockenbach,et al.  Motivating teammates: The leader's choice between positive and negative incentives , 2009 .

[8]  James M. Walker,et al.  Rewards and Sanctions and the Provision of Public Goods in One-Shot Settings , 2004 .

[9]  N. Nikiforakis,et al.  Mixing the carrots with the sticks: third party punishment and reward , 2013, Experimental Economics.

[10]  Marie-Claire Villeval,et al.  Does Monitoring Decrease Work Effort? The Complementarity between Agency and Crowding-Out Theories , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[11]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power , 2012 .

[12]  David G. Rand,et al.  Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation , 2009, Science.

[13]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[14]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public-good experiments , 2008 .

[15]  A. Riedl,et al.  The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Donald V. Moser,et al.  Bonus versus Penalty: Does Contract Frame Affect Employee Effort? , 2005 .

[17]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Just and Unjust Punishment: Influences on Subordinate Performance and Citizenship , 1994 .

[18]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Adding a stick to the carrot? The interaction of bonuses and fines , 2007 .

[19]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Another Hidden Cost of Incentives: The Detrimental Effect on Norm Enforcement , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[20]  M. Bigoni,et al.  Sticks and Carrots in Procurement , 2009 .

[21]  B. Rockenbach,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Sanctioning Institutions , 2006, Science.

[22]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Do Incentive Contracts Undermine Voluntary Cooperation? , 2002 .

[23]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  Fairness and contract design , 2007 .

[24]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Encouraging compliance: bonuses versus fines in inspection games , 2014 .

[25]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation , 2002 .

[26]  William H. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research , 2006 .

[27]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Further Thoughts on Punishment In Organizations , 1980 .

[28]  Bettina Rockenbach,et al.  On the interaction of the stick and the carrot in social dilemmas. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  The impact of rewards and punishments in a social context: A laboratory and field experiment , 1989 .

[30]  Daniel Balliet,et al.  Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Olivier Armantier,et al.  Framing of Incentives and Effort Provision , 2015 .

[32]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Hidden Costs and Returns of Incentives - Trust and Trustworthiness Among CEOS , 2004 .

[33]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[34]  H. Rauhut Higher Punishment, Less Control? , 2009 .

[35]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Hierarchy and Opportunism in Teams , 2005 .

[36]  Valentina V. Kuskova,et al.  Dispelling misconceptions and providing guidelines for leader reward and punishment behavior , 2010 .

[37]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Choosing the Carrot or the Stick? Endogenous Institutional Choice in Social Dilemma Situations , 2010 .

[38]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength , 2008 .

[39]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  Truth or Consequences: An Experiment , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Paul Glimcher,et al.  Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  J. Jamison,et al.  Selecting public goods institutions: Who likes to punish and reward? , 2015 .

[42]  T. Offerman,et al.  Inducing Good Behavior: Bonuses versus Fines in Inspection Games , 2010 .

[43]  Bernhard von Stengel,et al.  Chapter 51 Inspection games , 2002 .

[44]  B. Greiner,et al.  Imperfect Public Monitoring with Costly Punishment - An Experimental Study , 2011 .

[45]  Ben Greiner,et al.  An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments , 2004 .

[46]  Michael G. Lacy,et al.  A General-purpose Method for Two-group Randomization Tests , 2009 .

[47]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  When Punishment Fails: Research on Sanctions, Intentions and Non-Cooperation , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[48]  M. Bigoni,et al.  Sticks and Carrots in Procurement: An Experimental Exploration , 2014 .

[49]  Rudolf Avenhaus,et al.  Inspection Games , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[50]  Joseph Henrich,et al.  Constraining free riding in public goods games: designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Normative conflict and feuds: The limits of self-enforcement , 2012 .