Use of a computer-aided detection system to detect missed lung cancer at chest radiography.

PURPOSE To study the ability of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to detect lung cancer overlooked at initial interpretation by the radiologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was given for this study. Patient consent was not required; a HIPAA waiver was granted because of the retrospective nature of the data collection. In patients with lung cancer diagnosed from 1995 to 2006 at two institutions, each chest radiograph obtained prior to tumor discovery was evaluated by two radiologists for an overlooked lesion. The size and location of the nodules were documented and graded for subtlety (grades 1-4, 1 = very subtle). Each radiograph with a missed lesion was analyzed by a commercial CAD system, as was the follow-up image at diagnosis. An age- and sex-matched control group was used to assess CAD false-positive rates. RESULTS Missed lung cancer was found in 89 patients (age range, 51-86 years; mean age, 65 years; 80 men, nine women) on 114 radiographs. Lesion size ranged from 0.4 to 5.5 cm (mean, 1.8 cm). Lesions were most commonly peripheral (n = 63, 71%) and in upper lobes (n = 67, 75%). Lesion subtlety score was 1, 2, 3, or 4 on 43, 49, 17, and five radiographs, respectively. CAD identified 53 (47%) and 46 (52%) undetected lesions on a per-image and per-patient basis, respectively. The average size of lesions detected with CAD was 1.73 cm compared with 1.85 cm for lesions that were undetected (P = .47). A significant difference (P = .017) was found in the average subtlety score between detected lesions (score, 2.06) and undetected lesions (score, 1.68). An average of 3.9 false-positive results occurred per radiograph; an average of 2.4 false-positive results occurred per radiograph for the control group. CONCLUSION CAD has the potential to detect approximately half of the lesions overlooked by human readers at chest radiography.

[1]  D. R. Jones Natural History of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Early Detection , 2008 .

[2]  K. Doi,et al.  Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Austin,et al.  Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. , 1992, Radiology.

[4]  K. Doi,et al.  Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. , 1999, Chest.

[6]  A. Porcel,et al.  Characteristics of missed lung cancer on chest radiographs: a French experience , 2001, European Radiology.

[7]  H MacMahon,et al.  Improvement in detection of pulmonary nodules: digital image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. , 2000, Radiographics.

[8]  K. Doi,et al.  False-positive reduction in computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detecting nodules in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[9]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Digital radiography of the chest: detector techniques and performance parameters. , 2003, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[10]  S. Ou,et al.  Natural history of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: implications for early detection. , 2007, Chest.

[11]  K. Doi,et al.  Effect of high sensitivity in a computerized scheme for detecting extremely subtle solitary pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: observer performance study. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[12]  C. White,et al.  Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography: imaging and medicolegal issues. , 1999, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[13]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  W. E. Miller,et al.  Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. , 1983, Radiology.

[15]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. , 1983, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  J. Austin,et al.  Missed non-small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. , 2003, Radiology.

[17]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  Diameter of non-small cell lung cancer correlates with long-term survival: implications for T stage. , 2005, Chest.

[18]  H L Kundel,et al.  Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. , 1978, Investigative radiology.

[19]  M. Collins,et al.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2006, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[20]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  M. Greenstone,et al.  Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer , 2002, Postgraduate medical journal.

[22]  K. Doi,et al.  Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 1996, Radiology.

[23]  Anthony J. Sherbondy,et al.  Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. , 2005, Radiology.

[24]  K. Doi,et al.  Lung cancers missed on chest radiographs: results obtained with a commercial computer-aided detection program. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  L E Feinendegen,et al.  Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.