Evaluation of three nondestructive testing techniques for quality assessment of asphalt pavements

ABSTRACT This study evaluates three nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques for quality assessment of asphalt pavements. The three NDT techniques examined include an electromagnetic density gauge, a dynamic stiffness gauge, and geophysical surface wave tests for measuring modulus. In-situ NDT tests were carried out for four representative paving projects covering a range of asphalt mixes and traffic loads, and cores were extracted at the centre of each NDT testing location for laboratory measurement of density and modulus. A comprehensive correlation analysis was carried out to examine the performance of each NDT method for quantifying the quality of the asphalt pavements. The in-situ density had a low correlation with the laboratory density and was not sensitive to variations in temperature and asphalt mix type. The in-situ stiffness measured on the asphalt mixtures several hours after paving had a high correlation with the in-situ dynamic modulus and laboratory density, and is therefore recommended as a quantitative property for quality control. Among the three NDT measurements, the in-situ modulus was most sensitive to variations in temperature and asphalt mix type. After correction for temperature effects, the corrected modulus is recommended as a quantitative property for quality assurance.

[1]  Shibin Lin,et al.  Advancements in active surface wave methods: modeling, testing, and inversion , 2014 .

[2]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  In-Place Hot-Mix Asphalt Density Estimation Using Ground-Penetrating Radar , 2010 .

[3]  J. Ashlock,et al.  A study on issues relating to testing of soils and pavements by surface wave methods , 2012 .

[4]  R. Christopher Williams,et al.  Quality control/quality assurance testing for joint density and segregation of asphalt mixtures , 2013 .

[5]  E Ray Brown.  DENSITY OF ASPHALT CONCRETE - HOW MUCH IS NEEDED? , 1990 .

[6]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  Mechanistic quality management of hoi mix asphalt layers with seismic methods , 2005 .

[7]  R. Christopher Williams,et al.  Nondestructive quality assessment of asphalt pavements based on dynamic modulus , 2016 .

[8]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  Seismic Testing to Determine Quality of Hot-Mix Asphalt: , 2006 .

[9]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Evaluation of Traffic-Speed Deflectometers , 2012 .

[10]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Comparison of Nuclear and Nonnuclear Pavement Density Testing Devices , 2008 .

[11]  A. Das,et al.  Nondestructive testing of asphalt pavements for structural condition evaluation: a state of the art , 2008 .

[12]  R. Christopher Williams,et al.  Investigation of Electromagnetic Gauges for Determination of In-Place Density of HMA Pavements , 2009 .

[13]  Youngguk Seo,et al.  Dynamic Modulus Testing of Asphalt Concrete in Indirect Tension Mode , 2004 .

[14]  Susan L. Tighe,et al.  Combining Portable Falling Weight Deflectometer and Surface Wave Measurements for Evaluation of Longitudinal Joints in Asphalt Pavements , 2010 .

[15]  John W Henault,et al.  Quantifying Segregation in HMA Pavements Using Non-Nuclear Density Devices: Data Collection Report for Connecticut , 2006 .

[16]  J. Ashlock,et al.  Comparison of MASW and MSOR for Surface Wave Testing of Pavements , 2015 .

[17]  Stacy Goad Williams.  Non-Nuclear Methods for HMA Density Measurements , 2008 .

[18]  N. Rydén.  Surface wave testing of pavements. , 2009 .

[19]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  Use of NDT Equipment for Construction Quality Control of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements , 2006 .

[20]  H. Lee,et al.  Examination of Curing Criteria for Cold In-Place Recycling (Phase 3: Calibration of Moisture Loss Indices and Development of Stiffness Gain Model) , 2008 .