A synthesis of solar cycle prediction techniques

A number of techniques currently in use for predicting solar activity on a solar cycle timescale are tested with historical data. Some techniques, e.g., regression and curve fitting, work well as solar activity approaches maximum and provide a month-by-month description of future activity, while others, e.g., geomagnetic precursors, work well near solar minimum but only provide an estimate of the amplitude of the cycle. A synthesis of different techniques is shown to provide a more accurate and useful forecast of solar cycle activity levels. A combination of two uncorrelated geomagnetic precursor techniques provides a more accurate prediction for the amplitude of a solar activity cycle at a time well before activity minimum. This combined precursor method gives a smoothed sunspot number maximum of 154 ± 21 at the 95% level of confidence for the next cycle maximum. A mathematical function dependent on the time of cycle initiation and the cycle amplitude is used to describe the level of solar activity month by month for the next cycle. As the time of cycle maximum approaches a better estimate of the cycle activity is obtained by including the fit between previous activity levels and this function. This Combined Solar Cycle Activity Forecast gives, as of January 1999, a smoothed sunspot maximum of 146 ± 20 at the 95% level of confidence for the next cycle maximum.

[1]  W. Gleissberg Probability Laws of Sunspot Variations. , 1942 .

[2]  J. Q. Stewart,et al.  The Mathematical Characteristics of Sunspot Variations. II. , 1938 .

[3]  R. L. Holland,et al.  Lagrangian least-squares prediction of solar flux (F10.7) , 1984 .

[4]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[5]  A. J. Conway,et al.  A neural network prediction of solar cycle 23 , 1998 .

[6]  Kenneth H. Schatten,et al.  Solar activity forecast for solar cycle 23 , 1996 .

[7]  D. Hathaway,et al.  The shape of the sunspot cycle , 1994 .

[8]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[9]  Kenneth H. Schatten,et al.  Using Dynamo Theory to predict the sunspot number during Solar Cycle 21 , 1978 .

[10]  P. Simon,et al.  Toward a model of a two-component solar cycle , 1992 .

[11]  Kenneth H. Schatten,et al.  An early solar dynamo prediction : cycle 23 ∼ cycle 22 , 1993 .

[12]  Robert M. Wilson,et al.  An early estimate for the size of cycle 23 , 1992 .

[13]  J. V. Lincoln,et al.  Prediction of sunspot numbers , 1949 .

[14]  H. Schwentek,et al.  Fitting the sunspot cycles 10–21 by a modified F-distribution density function , 1992 .

[15]  J. Feynman Geomagnetic and solar wind cycles, 1900–1975 , 1982 .

[16]  R. Thompson,et al.  A technique for predicting the amplitude of the solar cycle , 1993 .

[17]  Kenneth H. Schatten,et al.  Panel achieves consensus prediction of solar cycle 23 , 1997 .

[18]  P. Mayaud,et al.  Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices , 1980 .

[19]  D. Hathaway,et al.  Estimating the size and timing of maximum amplitude for cycle 23 from its early cycle behavior , 1998 .

[20]  A. Cook On the mathematical characteristics of sunspot-variations , 1949 .

[21]  William W. Vaughan,et al.  Statistical Technique for Intermediate and Long-Range Estimation of 13-Month Smoothed Solar Flux and Geomagnetic Index , 1996 .

[22]  S. Sofia,et al.  Dynamo-based scheme for forecasting the magnitude of solar activity cycles , 1991 .

[23]  R. Calvo,et al.  Neural Network Prediction of Solar Activity , 1995 .

[24]  D. Hathaway,et al.  An estimate for the size of cycle 23 based on near minimum conditions , 1998 .