About Regressive Saccades in Reading and Their Relation to Word Identification

Publisher Summary This chapter illustrates regressive saccades in reading and their relation to word identification. While reading, the most common pattern is that of the eyes moving forward from one word to the next, with fixations lasting for about 250 ms. Variations in this general pattern are also observed, such as the eyes skipping the next word, or making an additional fixation on the word before moving on to the next word(s). Occasionally, the eyes also return to previously read portions of the text, which correspond to what is commonly called “regressive saccades” in opposition to the more frequent “progressive saccades”. Research has been conducted to determine the extent to which this variability in ocular behavior, and particularly that associated with progressive movements, relates to ongoing processing of the encountered words and sentences. A single mechanism cannot be responsible for the variability of the ocular behavior in reading. Both higher level lexical and linguistic characteristics of the text and lower level “visuomotor” constraints and predetermined “oculomotor” scanning strategies contribute to this variability. A “regressive saccade”, on the other hand, is initiated, if a review of previously read text is necessitated to “re encode” it or further process it to deeper levels.

[1]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .

[2]  M D Reddix,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes , 1985 .

[4]  H. Bouma,et al.  Visual search and reading : eye movements and functional visual field : a tutorial review , 1978 .

[5]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  9 – Eye Movements and Context Effects during Reading of Extended Discourse , 1983 .

[7]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Foveal Load and Parafoveal Processing , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  F. Vitu,et al.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. O'Regan Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[11]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  On words and their letters , 1991 .

[12]  H D Crane,et al.  Accurate two-dimensional eye tracker using first and fourth Purkinje images. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  H Herman Bouma,et al.  On the control of eye saccades in reading , 1974 .

[14]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Evalyn Bayle,et al.  The Nature and Causes of Regressive Movements in Reading , 1942 .

[16]  Gary A. Klein,et al.  Effect of Task Demands on Relationship between Eye Movements and Sentence Complexity , 1974 .

[17]  J. J. Andriessen,et al.  Analysis of eye movement patterns in silent reading , 1973 .

[18]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. , 1987 .

[20]  J. Kevin O'Regan,et al.  A Challenge to Current Theories of Eye Movements in Reading. , 1995 .

[21]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  J. Pynte,et al.  Lexical control of within-word eye movements. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect: On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[25]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[26]  Wayne Shebilske,et al.  Reading Eye Movements from an Information-Processing Point of View , 1975 .